General Discussion

Devil Child

(2,728 posts)

35. Hmmm which has more relevance to me....

Fri Nov 12, 2021, 12:42 PM

Nov 2021

Watching and following all the details of the trial since start or some convicted domestic abuser's opinion from sep 2020?

Yeah, I'll go with the actual courtroom evidence and statements.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

93 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Combat vet has pertinent comments about Rittenhouse: [View all] tblue37 Nov 2021 OP

damn straight Skittles Nov 2021 #1

++ Xipe Totec Nov 2021 #3

He is pretty good at killing people. twodogsbarking Nov 2021 #22

Would the military even take the little shit with his juvenile record? 2Gingersnaps Nov 2021 #27

He'd have needed his GED. maxsolomon Nov 2021 #66

He doesn't have a criminal record whopis01 Nov 2021 #76

I think he "tried" to enlist Skittles Nov 2021 #85

He is an aggressor. He chose to be in the middle of violence. Dawson Leery Nov 2021 #2

hope he get's life with-out parole on all count's ! monkeyman1 Nov 2021 #4

100% correct. Thanks for the perspective! Martin68 Nov 2021 #5

You'll never see this on any RW site. n/t aggiesal Nov 2021 #6

Succinct and to the point Alice Kramden Nov 2021 #7

prosecution should have had this guy on the stand cadoman Nov 2021 #13

Agree completely n/t Alice Kramden Nov 2021 #15

Well said Beringia Nov 2021 #8

Truth!! Catherine Vincent Nov 2021 #9

Roger that! TomSlick Nov 2021 #10

Insurgent. Blue Owl Nov 2021 #11

This little Motherfucker is probably going to get away with it! nvme Nov 2021 #12

K&R betsuni Nov 2021 #14

Someone should send this to the prosecutor. panader0 Nov 2021 #16

Then one of those he shot is a terrorist and insurgent... LiberatedUSA Nov 2021 #17

Agreed Devil Child Nov 2021 #19

Yeah, but that dude used a lot of terms and called it facts Hav Nov 2021 #20

+1 Kaleva Nov 2021 #24

And it doesn't help we allow people to parade around the streets with loaded, Vinca Nov 2021 #18

k&r BSdetect Nov 2021 #21

The man with the pistol and who was shot in the arm by Rittenhouse is also a terrorist Kaleva Nov 2021 #23

Is there a separate court case for that person? LuckyCharms Nov 2021 #29

Too bad that guy didn't shoot back. Ligyron Nov 2021 #31

Thats is literally what happened. Zeitghost Nov 2021 #45

I haven't seen that sequence of events in anything I've read maxsolomon Nov 2021 #67

I don't think it's at all fair to characterize Grosskreutz as having "feigned surrender." Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #73

thanks, that helps maxsolomon Nov 2021 #74

Eh, facts is facts. First result I got that showed the exchange under cross-examination. Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #75

There really should be. Dr. Strange Nov 2021 #32

Thanks. n/t LuckyCharms Nov 2021 #38

I don't think the guy has been charged but don't know for sure. Kaleva Nov 2021 #58

I don't think the guy has been charged but don't know for sure. Kaleva Nov 2021 #59

Exactly. Fortinbras Armstrong Nov 2021 #25

"If he didn't want to be harmed, he should have stayed home." LiberatedUSA Nov 2021 #28

By the time he had arrived there had been two prior xmas74 Nov 2021 #40

My "insinuation" is that Rittenhouse went to Kenosha Fortinbras Armstrong Nov 2021 #93

Does anyone use google before lifting some random txt from some random dude way up high? Devil Child Nov 2021 #26

Does that mean what he wrote is incorrect? maxsolomon Nov 2021 #68

Ill see your ad hominem and raise with all the celebratory appeals to authority Devil Child Nov 2021 #69

Luckily, IDGAF about his bona fides as a combat vet. maxsolomon Nov 2021 #71

Except WI law doesn't see it that way Amishman Nov 2021 #30

This message was self-deleted by its author ExTex Nov 2021 #44

He's absolutely being ignored because his posts are going against the narrative. Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #51

technically it was illegal for him to be there, but that doesn't change the primary issue Amishman Nov 2021 #54

to be fair a mini lecture on legal statutes isn't exactly gripping material Amishman Nov 2021 #53

I thought it was an excellent lecture. femmedem Nov 2021 #89

It took a while UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #33

Let me ask you a simple question. Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #34

Even your UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #36

And you fail to answer the question, which is all the answer I needed. Thanks! :) N/T Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #39

Subpoena me, counselor UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #42

Nah, total waste of the court's time. :) N/T Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #43

Kind of like UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #46

Funny how you still won't answer that simple question, but you keep replying... :) N/T Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #48

Funny how you UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #50

I asked you a simple question and you refuse to answer, which I find amusing. Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #52

I find it amusing UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #55

The fact that you don't consider it a serious question is even more amusing. Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #56

The longer your UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #61

... Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #64

Hmmm which has more relevance to me.... Devil Child Nov 2021 #35

What's relevant to you UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #37

That is legit hilarious. Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #41

I have a preconceived notion. LiberatedUSA Nov 2021 #72

Is that UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #78

I was happy with that court outcome. N/t LiberatedUSA Nov 2021 #82

You can call the demonstrably true facts... Zeitghost Nov 2021 #47

Interesting UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #49

You are correct Hav Nov 2021 #60

It because the OP is an opinion Zeitghost Nov 2021 #65

And yet UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #70

The prosecution witness Zeitghost Nov 2021 #80

The notion UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #81

I agree Zeitghost Nov 2021 #84

Well of course UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #87

Glad to see McCain's comments spreading all over Facebook. (nt) Paladin Nov 2021 #57

If I had a dollar for every "combat vet" who said he was... WhiskeyGrinder Nov 2021 #62

So true sarisataka Nov 2021 #63

Kick and rec this one for the Rittenhouse brigade. Kingofalldems Nov 2021 #77

Here it is for the Twitterless FakeNoose Nov 2021 #79

Yes but will this judge take that into consideration?? YoshidaYui Nov 2021 #83

Pretty loose definition of insurgent & terrorist, neither seem to apply in this case. nt EX500rider Nov 2021 #86

Clear and precise dlk Nov 2021 #88

I don't necessarily agree with this. tymorial Nov 2021 #90

Putting semantics aside: Aussie105 Nov 2021 #91

Chickenhouse raising2moredems Nov 2021 #92