General Discussion

UnderThisLaw

(335 posts)

36. Even your

Reply to Jedi Guy (Reply #34)

Fri Nov 12, 2021, 12:44 PM

Nov 2021

replies are talking points

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

93 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Combat vet has pertinent comments about Rittenhouse: [View all] tblue37 Nov 2021 OP

damn straight Skittles Nov 2021 #1

++ Xipe Totec Nov 2021 #3

He is pretty good at killing people. twodogsbarking Nov 2021 #22

Would the military even take the little shit with his juvenile record? 2Gingersnaps Nov 2021 #27

He'd have needed his GED. maxsolomon Nov 2021 #66

He doesn't have a criminal record whopis01 Nov 2021 #76

I think he "tried" to enlist Skittles Nov 2021 #85

He is an aggressor. He chose to be in the middle of violence. Dawson Leery Nov 2021 #2

hope he get's life with-out parole on all count's ! monkeyman1 Nov 2021 #4

100% correct. Thanks for the perspective! Martin68 Nov 2021 #5

You'll never see this on any RW site. n/t aggiesal Nov 2021 #6

Succinct and to the point Alice Kramden Nov 2021 #7

prosecution should have had this guy on the stand cadoman Nov 2021 #13

Agree completely n/t Alice Kramden Nov 2021 #15

Well said Beringia Nov 2021 #8

Truth!! Catherine Vincent Nov 2021 #9

Roger that! TomSlick Nov 2021 #10

Insurgent. Blue Owl Nov 2021 #11

This little Motherfucker is probably going to get away with it! nvme Nov 2021 #12

K&R betsuni Nov 2021 #14

Someone should send this to the prosecutor. panader0 Nov 2021 #16

Then one of those he shot is a terrorist and insurgent... LiberatedUSA Nov 2021 #17

Agreed Devil Child Nov 2021 #19

Yeah, but that dude used a lot of terms and called it facts Hav Nov 2021 #20

+1 Kaleva Nov 2021 #24

And it doesn't help we allow people to parade around the streets with loaded, Vinca Nov 2021 #18

k&r BSdetect Nov 2021 #21

The man with the pistol and who was shot in the arm by Rittenhouse is also a terrorist Kaleva Nov 2021 #23

Is there a separate court case for that person? LuckyCharms Nov 2021 #29

Too bad that guy didn't shoot back. Ligyron Nov 2021 #31

Thats is literally what happened. Zeitghost Nov 2021 #45

I haven't seen that sequence of events in anything I've read maxsolomon Nov 2021 #67

I don't think it's at all fair to characterize Grosskreutz as having "feigned surrender." Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #73

thanks, that helps maxsolomon Nov 2021 #74

Eh, facts is facts. First result I got that showed the exchange under cross-examination. Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #75

There really should be. Dr. Strange Nov 2021 #32

Thanks. n/t LuckyCharms Nov 2021 #38

I don't think the guy has been charged but don't know for sure. Kaleva Nov 2021 #58

I don't think the guy has been charged but don't know for sure. Kaleva Nov 2021 #59

Exactly. Fortinbras Armstrong Nov 2021 #25

"If he didn't want to be harmed, he should have stayed home." LiberatedUSA Nov 2021 #28

By the time he had arrived there had been two prior xmas74 Nov 2021 #40

My "insinuation" is that Rittenhouse went to Kenosha Fortinbras Armstrong Nov 2021 #93

Does anyone use google before lifting some random txt from some random dude way up high? Devil Child Nov 2021 #26

Does that mean what he wrote is incorrect? maxsolomon Nov 2021 #68

Ill see your ad hominem and raise with all the celebratory appeals to authority Devil Child Nov 2021 #69

Luckily, IDGAF about his bona fides as a combat vet. maxsolomon Nov 2021 #71

Except WI law doesn't see it that way Amishman Nov 2021 #30

This message was self-deleted by its author ExTex Nov 2021 #44

He's absolutely being ignored because his posts are going against the narrative. Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #51

technically it was illegal for him to be there, but that doesn't change the primary issue Amishman Nov 2021 #54

to be fair a mini lecture on legal statutes isn't exactly gripping material Amishman Nov 2021 #53

I thought it was an excellent lecture. femmedem Nov 2021 #89

It took a while UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #33

Let me ask you a simple question. Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #34

Even your UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #36

And you fail to answer the question, which is all the answer I needed. Thanks! :) N/T Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #39

Subpoena me, counselor UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #42

Nah, total waste of the court's time. :) N/T Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #43

Kind of like UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #46

Funny how you still won't answer that simple question, but you keep replying... :) N/T Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #48

Funny how you UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #50

I asked you a simple question and you refuse to answer, which I find amusing. Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #52

I find it amusing UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #55

The fact that you don't consider it a serious question is even more amusing. Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #56

The longer your UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #61

... Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #64

Hmmm which has more relevance to me.... Devil Child Nov 2021 #35

What's relevant to you UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #37

That is legit hilarious. Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #41

I have a preconceived notion. LiberatedUSA Nov 2021 #72

Is that UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #78

I was happy with that court outcome. N/t LiberatedUSA Nov 2021 #82

You can call the demonstrably true facts... Zeitghost Nov 2021 #47

Interesting UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #49

You are correct Hav Nov 2021 #60

It because the OP is an opinion Zeitghost Nov 2021 #65

And yet UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #70

The prosecution witness Zeitghost Nov 2021 #80

The notion UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #81

I agree Zeitghost Nov 2021 #84

Well of course UnderThisLaw Nov 2021 #87

Glad to see McCain's comments spreading all over Facebook. (nt) Paladin Nov 2021 #57

If I had a dollar for every "combat vet" who said he was... WhiskeyGrinder Nov 2021 #62

So true sarisataka Nov 2021 #63

Kick and rec this one for the Rittenhouse brigade. Kingofalldems Nov 2021 #77

Here it is for the Twitterless FakeNoose Nov 2021 #79

Yes but will this judge take that into consideration?? YoshidaYui Nov 2021 #83

Pretty loose definition of insurgent & terrorist, neither seem to apply in this case. nt EX500rider Nov 2021 #86

Clear and precise dlk Nov 2021 #88

I don't necessarily agree with this. tymorial Nov 2021 #90

Putting semantics aside: Aussie105 Nov 2021 #91

Chickenhouse raising2moredems Nov 2021 #92