Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Steve Bannon [View all]Silent3
(15,909 posts)38. Stopped what investigation?
You imagine an "investigation" is going on right now? What investigation? Gathering the data to show that Bannon is 99.999% likely to be found guilty, because charging Bannon when he's only 99.99% likely to be found guilty would be too intemperate and wildly undemocratic?
I can't be sure Meadows wouldn't stonewall no matter what, but he's certainly emboldened to stonewall when he sees Bannon paying no penalty for contempt. They're both playing the game of running out the clock, and it's because the real world keeps teaching them that running out the clock works. Garland doesn't seem to care if he helps the game of running out the clock keep working.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And Garland does nothing. I hate to say this but I am leaning toward wanting Garland's removal
Boydog
Nov 2021
#7
And yet there are a lot of legal experts who are also wondering why it's taking Garland so long
Poiuyt
Nov 2021
#10
Actually OLC memos are binding *unless overturned by the Attorney General or President*
Silent3
Nov 2021
#17
Do you propose that Garland overturn all of them? Some of them? One of them?
Beastly Boy
Nov 2021
#19
If your objection is this general, what does it have to do with Garland at all?
Beastly Boy
Nov 2021
#28
I simply don't concur that all DoJ and OLC policy is and always has been to protect democracy
Silent3
Nov 2021
#35
Oh yeah, Meadows would have folded if only Garland stopped his investigation midstream!
Beastly Boy
Nov 2021
#36