Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Combat vet has pertinent comments about Rittenhouse: [View all]Jedi Guy
(3,481 posts)73. I don't think it's at all fair to characterize Grosskreutz as having "feigned surrender."
That implies he was trying to psych KR out and then kill him, which I don't believe was ever his intent.
That said, under cross-examination he did admit that he had his gun in his hand, raised his hands, and then inadvertently pointed the gun at KR again, at which point KR fired and hit him in the arm. That admission does play right into the hands of a self-defense claim.
So when you were standing three to five feet from him with your arms up in the air, he never fired, right? Corey Chirafisi, a defense lawyer, asked.
Correct, Mr. Grosskreutz answered.
It wasnt until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him with your gun now your hands down, pointed at him that he fired, right? Mr. Chirafisi said.
Correct, he said.
Correct, Mr. Grosskreutz answered.
It wasnt until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him with your gun now your hands down, pointed at him that he fired, right? Mr. Chirafisi said.
Correct, he said.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/08/us/kyle-rittenhouse-gaige-grosskreutz-testimony.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The man with the pistol and who was shot in the arm by Rittenhouse is also a terrorist
Kaleva
Nov 2021
#23
I don't think it's at all fair to characterize Grosskreutz as having "feigned surrender."
Jedi Guy
Nov 2021
#73
Eh, facts is facts. First result I got that showed the exchange under cross-examination.
Jedi Guy
Nov 2021
#75
Does anyone use google before lifting some random txt from some random dude way up high?
Devil Child
Nov 2021
#26
Ill see your ad hominem and raise with all the celebratory appeals to authority
Devil Child
Nov 2021
#69
He's absolutely being ignored because his posts are going against the narrative.
Jedi Guy
Nov 2021
#51
technically it was illegal for him to be there, but that doesn't change the primary issue
Amishman
Nov 2021
#54
And you fail to answer the question, which is all the answer I needed. Thanks! :) N/T
Jedi Guy
Nov 2021
#39
Funny how you still won't answer that simple question, but you keep replying... :) N/T
Jedi Guy
Nov 2021
#48
Pretty loose definition of insurgent & terrorist, neither seem to apply in this case. nt
EX500rider
Nov 2021
#86