Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Steve Bannon [View all]
 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
42. As if you presented evidence...
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 06:30 PM
Nov 2021

…rather than mere “trust the system” complacency?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Steve Bannon [View all] Boydog Nov 2021 OP
Every day he walks free the Democrats lose core voters. The Wizard Nov 2021 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Boydog Nov 2021 #2
We need to demand that Garland move Boydog Nov 2021 #3
Bannon is doing way worse than that, gab13by13 Nov 2021 #4
And Garland does nothing. I hate to say this but I am leaning toward wanting Garland's removal Boydog Nov 2021 #7
Contact the White House. I did. Joinfortmill Nov 2021 #5
I guess they don't believe it. Corgigal Nov 2021 #24
What does Garland need to be accountable for? Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #6
I think considering what we have been through Boydog Nov 2021 #8
The degree of his agressiveness is entirely at his discretion. Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #9
And yet there are a lot of legal experts who are also wondering why it's taking Garland so long Poiuyt Nov 2021 #10
Actually there are very few legal experts who are wondering about Garland. Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #12
There may be a lot of rules, but there's also a lot of room for discretion Silent3 Nov 2021 #11
As far as Garland is concerned, there is virtually no discretion. Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #13
Actually OLC memos are binding *unless overturned by the Attorney General or President* Silent3 Nov 2021 #17
Do you propose that Garland overturn all of them? Some of them? One of them? Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #19
Whichever ones are in the way Silent3 Nov 2021 #20
Garland is part of the executive branch Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #23
I'm talking specifically about the imperial presidency Silent3 Nov 2021 #25
Garland was appointed by Biden. Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #26
The "imperial presidency" isn't about any specific President Silent3 Nov 2021 #27
If your objection is this general, what does it have to do with Garland at all? Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #28
It's Garland's choice if he's kowtows to bad precedents... Silent3 Nov 2021 #29
Now you are running in circles. Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #30
What circles, other than you simply gainsaying what I said? Silent3 Nov 2021 #31
You are either misunderstanding or disregarding the content of my post. Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #34
I simply don't concur that all DoJ and OLC policy is and always has been to protect democracy Silent3 Nov 2021 #35
And now Mark Meadows refuses to comply with a subpoena Silent3 Nov 2021 #33
Oh yeah, Meadows would have folded if only Garland stopped his investigation midstream! Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #36
Stopped what investigation? Silent3 Nov 2021 #38
This investigation: Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #39
I'm glad something finally happened Silent3 Nov 2021 #40
And, of course you have no evidence for what you are are suggesting. Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #41
As if you presented evidence... Silent3 Nov 2021 #42
For sure. If this was a Barr DOJ with a republican congress, Bannon would already be in jail. triron Nov 2021 #15
So what the hell is Garland doing? Boydog Nov 2021 #21
Wanking off to Judge Judy fan fiction, for all I know Silent3 Nov 2021 #22
Every day of silence and inaction by Garland Boydog Nov 2021 #14
Garland is a version of Neville Chamberlain. triron Nov 2021 #16
I will accept this as your opinion. Beastly Boy Nov 2021 #18
The J6 committee should subpoena Garland, Dave says Nov 2021 #32
Why the Justice Department is Taking So Long to Indict Steve Bannon Ohio Joe Nov 2021 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Steve Bannon»Reply #42