General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rittenhouse Trial [View all]H2O Man
(78,949 posts)akin to the OP here in response to an old friend's post on facebook earlier in the week. Someone I don't know responded in a mild attack directed at me, asking why I was so "outraged"? My response was to hit the "laugh" thing, as I wasn't entirely sure if he was serious or not. A half-dozen others also "laughed," so I'm hoping he was joking. But these days, it can be hard to be sure.
We've had a wide variety of judges in this region over the decades. Overall, the quality is improving. Nothing so bad that I've needed to help anyone appeal since around 2000.
Over our many years on this forum, we've spoken of judges -- including some very conservative ones -- who do a good job. Thus, I think it is equally good when we point out that Schroeder is disgraceful. It's way, way too serious a case ...... the Kyle-ites are watching, hoping to get license to shoot people on the streets of America, and get away with it.