Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rittenhouse Trial [View all]Amishman
(5,928 posts)62. The weak case under law probably is why
I've posted on it numerous time recently; but to summarize, when you dig into the actual statutes and compare against the evidence, there isn't much to support the charges. WI law allows self defense in almost all situations if the person fled / retreated first - which he did. The only exception is if their intent when provoking was to use it as an excuse to cause harm - the problem here is intent is extremely hard to prove in court and it does not appear the prosecution has come close.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thank you, H2O MAN. As I've posted prior, majority of my extended family are lawyers with a judge,
hlthe2b
Nov 2021
#2
I posted a long detailed thread elsewhere. I no longer debate with those so clearly in the defense
hlthe2b
Nov 2021
#11
So because I don't agree with your assessment of the judge, I support Rittenhouse?
Jedi Guy
Nov 2021
#12
Anyone who thinks the judge is biased should have watched yesterday's proceedings
Sympthsical
Nov 2021
#25
It is astonishing it wasn't moved to a different county and appoint a special prosecutor.
LiberalFighter
Nov 2021
#26
Hard to do when prosecutors must call victims "rioters, looters or arsonists."
Kid Berwyn
Nov 2021
#17
You know what's really amusing about you clinging to Paul Butler's "expert" opinion?
Jedi Guy
Nov 2021
#57
Fortunately, most of Schroeder's junk was not in front of jury. And, he is allowing lesser charges,
Hoyt
Nov 2021
#7
I was surprised to learn that it's fine to walk down crowded city streets with a loaded AR
Tomconroy
Nov 2021
#15
Yet it's not ok to defend yourself against an assault weapon, with a skateboard.
mzmolly
Nov 2021
#37
Thinking, and hoping, that a jury can still filter out judicial biases if they exist
bucolic_frolic
Nov 2021
#16
I think that regardless of outcome, Rittenhouse will be hailed as a hero to the maga-class
Bristlecone
Nov 2021
#30