Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
12. Don't forget CONTEXT. It was a hugely passionate issue that involved and divided
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 10:54 AM
Nov 2021

families, towns, the entire nation. A lot lke today. There were various anti-slavery factions and parties, a group for every range of viewpoint-- all the way from those trying to confine slavery to the southern states and prevent its spread on one end (likely including this NYT piece's author) to those who cheered the murders of non-slaveowning farmers by probably psychopathic raiders -- in the name of god and abolishing slavery. And of course the passions of those who believed god ordained slavery, or just passionately feared having to wash their own laundry.

Craziness, violence, factional anger, irrationality, fear rampant. There were years of calls to calm down before it destroyed their democracy and factional murders in regions where slavery was contested became much worse. This one came shortly before it finally blew up in civil war.

Sound familiar at all? Society changes, personality doesn't.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A 1859 NYT editorial scol...»Reply #12