Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bev54

(10,051 posts)

14. Well they could have and that was decided by the judge

Reply to Sympthsical (Reply #13)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 08:31 PM

Nov 2021

but the defense is the one claiming in their summation that the prosecution could have called them, knowing that Mr. could plead the 5th but failed to say that. When the prosecutor rebutted that he stood up to say it was not in evidence. Shit man you brought it up!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here we go, judge is pissed . . . [View all] Sympthsical Nov 2021 OP

Oh ffs! Heartstrings Nov 2021 #1

What happened? Tomconroy Nov 2021 #2

Prosecutor started messing with the 5th Amendment again Sympthsical Nov 2021 #4

Disaster averted, it looks like. Dr. Strange Nov 2021 #7

Yeah, judge found an exit Sympthsical Nov 2021 #9

Honestly pretty generous of him Amishman Nov 2021 #11

yeah what happened? We aren't all watching Beaverhausen Nov 2021 #3

Some details perhaps? sheshe2 Nov 2021 #5

I can't see your radio broadcast. 48656c6c6f20 Nov 2021 #6

I hate this judge. BlackSkimmer Nov 2021 #8

He looked like this was the first time he had actually sat and thought about what he did Walleye Nov 2021 #10

The defense attorney is at fault here, saying the prosecution could have called them Bev54 Nov 2021 #12

My ultimate understanding of the resolution Sympthsical Nov 2021 #13

Well they could have and that was decided by the judge Bev54 Nov 2021 #14