Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

harumph

(3,385 posts)
9. That's a good "theory" but when $ is allocated
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 09:39 AM
Nov 2021

in an inequitable and haphazard way, people are going to be
mad.

Speaking (generally) to the "instrument of justice" theory... whenever a cop does something terrible, we tend to shout "I hope the department
gets sued into the ground!" but it never happens b/c the self insuring municipalities cover the cost - to the detriment of the citizenry.
I don't find financial penalties have any effect whatsoever on police behavior - b/c the cops themselves don't pay.

In the case of the asylum seekers, I agree there should be some kind of compensation and it should be capped. I'm going to say that
excessive financial distributions will actually encourage more to seek asylum despite the risks. I know that is a terribly unpopular view here - but you have to understand the conditions where many of the immigrants are coming from.

Flame away.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Snap Out of It: We Aren't...»Reply #9