Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nanjeanne

(6,622 posts)
10. Since taxes are progressive based on the different brackets it's perfectly
Thu Nov 18, 2021, 11:07 PM
Nov 2021

acceptable to me to have wealthy people pay significant percentage on the income over 1-2 million. In 1970 the tax rate over $100,000 was 70%. In 2021 that would be approximately $713,000. I wouldn’t go that far but I’d be happy to see a tax of 50% on the portion of income over a million or two.

We message taxes so strangely. So many people believe if you say 50% on income over a million that it’s 50% on the whole income. But we have tax brackets and everyone pays the same % in the brackets. So someone making $1,200,000.00 would pay 50% on the $200,000 not the whole enchilada. And that’s after the deductions, etc. It’s crazy to me that the effective tax rate of billionaires is about 8%. But talking about taxes has become so difficult. It’s misunderstood and badly messaged.

I remember in 2008 Biden saying paying taxes is patriotic and being lambasted for it. He was right and if we actually paid taxes for thing people needed and wanted like education, infrastructure, healthcare, etc we would be doing the most patriotic thing we could be doing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I would set a threshold at wherever the top 1% falls and no deductions over that Amishman Nov 2021 #1
Even 30% would raise a fortune. LakeArenal Nov 2021 #2
A 45% effective rate. iemanja Nov 2021 #3
I was just about to post 50% Dave says Nov 2021 #29
70% for the first 5 years. Ka-Dinh Oy Nov 2021 #4
91% like under Eisenhower tenderfoot Nov 2021 #5
Nobody Paid 91% ProfessorGAC Nov 2021 #8
10,000 households hit the 91% bracket in 1950 Dave says Nov 2021 #26
Fair Point ProfessorGAC Nov 2021 #27
Force cap gains/losses to be realized annually, bump cap rate to 40%, set min eff. rate at 40% LonePirate Nov 2021 #6
90% marginal rate Dave says Nov 2021 #7
See Post 8 ProfessorGAC Nov 2021 #9
Since taxes are progressive based on the different brackets it's perfectly Nanjeanne Nov 2021 #10
What I pay newdayneeded Nov 2021 #11
Not exactly on point, but I read once that pollsters found that one of the EarnestPutz Nov 2021 #12
51% and progressively greater beyond that. hunter Nov 2021 #13
35% Skittles Nov 2021 #14
Another source of taxation newdayneeded Nov 2021 #15
50% rate for over $1 million mvd Nov 2021 #16
How do you make corporations pay taxes that aren't passed down to the consumers? marie999 Nov 2021 #28
Some of the current Democratic ideas are a start mvd Nov 2021 #32
90% and we'll take 40 years to work our way down from that. Bluethroughu Nov 2021 #17
50% top status bracket. IbogaProject Nov 2021 #18
Treat all income the same Johnny2X2X Nov 2021 #19
Ding ding ding, we have a winner! LastDemocratInSC Nov 2021 #20
The inverse of this: meadowlander Nov 2021 #21
yes IbogaProject Nov 2021 #31
I'd say a minimum rate of 40% over $1m NowISeetheLight Nov 2021 #22
Whatever they were paying in Eisenhower's administration Hekate Nov 2021 #23
This was the go to tax site in the 80s and early 00s Buzz cook Nov 2021 #24
A fair share requires the rich to feel a need to cut elsewhere, as is common at lower incomes sanatanadharma Nov 2021 #25
Fixating on a specific rate is the wrong approach Hav Nov 2021 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What do you consider a "f...»Reply #10