Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: IMO the prosecution in the Riddenhouse trial was poor. Why did they put on... [View all]radius777
(3,921 posts)24. The FULL truth should've been allowed in,
ie that Rittenhouse was a far-right white supremacist who went looking to 'do battle' with the left/antifa/BLM. Motive is a key element in any crime. Rittenhouse was not just some citizen minding his business, but an extremist looking for violence.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
IMO the prosecution in the Riddenhouse trial was poor. Why did they put on... [View all]
brush
Nov 2021
OP
Are you kidding? You actually think that him saying he pointed a gun at the killer...
brush
Nov 2021
#16
Doing that would then open it up for the defense to bring up the past of Rosenbaum and Huber
DetroitLegalBeagle
Nov 2021
#39
Because people tend to divide into "Us or them" rather than truth and supporting evidence. n/t
Decoy of Fenris
Nov 2021
#50
Bad decision to put him on the stand. Why in the world would you put on a witness...
brush
Nov 2021
#9
So what if he is a democrat, he is still a shit judge and that needs to be called out
krawhitham
Nov 2021
#45