Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Zeitghost

(4,557 posts)
29. Yes
Fri Nov 19, 2021, 09:15 PM
Nov 2021

If anything is at fault here, it is WI law. According to the well documented facts, including video, forensic and witness testimony and the WI law at play, the jury reached the correct legal decision.

That you're advocating for less truth to become known, simply to give the prosecution an edge should be your first hint that you are not pursuing justice.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The judge is a biased right winger radius777 Nov 2021 #1
Yeah, good take. brush Nov 2021 #6
I have no proof, but I'm not sure 2 of the 3 were fighting for justice. Hoyt Nov 2021 #10
There are anti-fascists who believe in meeting radius777 Nov 2021 #23
Still not convinced. There are also people who like to go where there's trouble. Hoyt Nov 2021 #37
I suspect the fix was in from the get. Lunabell Nov 2021 #2
Maybe the prosecution was part of the fix. nt Progressive Jones Nov 2021 #11
I don't doubt it. Lunabell Nov 2021 #40
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2021 #3
Agreed, that charge should probably have been tossed pretrial Amishman Nov 2021 #14
Why would you be disappointed... Zeitghost Nov 2021 #4
They shouldn't have put him on. Two people are dead and the killer walks. brush Nov 2021 #8
Again Zeitghost Nov 2021 #13
Are you kidding? You actually think that him saying he pointed a gun at the killer... brush Nov 2021 #16
So just to be clear... Zeitghost Nov 2021 #20
Was justice done? brush Nov 2021 #22
Yes Zeitghost Nov 2021 #29
Forget about not putting the wounded guy on. I'm no lawyer and don't know... brush Nov 2021 #33
You're making the correct decision to walk away Zeitghost Nov 2021 #34
Ok, smart guy, you think justice was done, check out this link. brush Nov 2021 #36
That thread is a joke Zeitghost Nov 2021 #38
It influenced them for sure Polybius Nov 2021 #47
The FULL truth should've been allowed in, radius777 Nov 2021 #24
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2021 #32
Doing that would then open it up for the defense to bring up the past of Rosenbaum and Huber DetroitLegalBeagle Nov 2021 #39
No prosecutor / judge / jury combo would have found him guilty. Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #5
Jury is always a wildcard, but you are otherwise correct Amishman Nov 2021 #19
Why is this so hard for people to understand?...n/t Kang Colby Nov 2021 #49
Because people tend to divide into "Us or them" rather than truth and supporting evidence. n/t Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #50
SMH Kang Colby Nov 2021 #53
What you are basically hinting at Hav Nov 2021 #7
Bad decision to put him on the stand. Why in the world would you put on a witness... brush Nov 2021 #9
They should have made the case for attempted homicide Hav Nov 2021 #17
Just one question, do you think justice was done? brush Nov 2021 #21
So you believe prosecutors should be able to hide exculpatory evidence? ripcord Nov 2021 #25
According to the law maybe but otherwise it's impossible to answer for me Hav Nov 2021 #27
Ok, forget about not putting the wounded guy on. I'm no lawyer and don't know... brush Nov 2021 #30
Post removed Post removed Nov 2021 #42
and of course that is the bottom line radius777 Nov 2021 #28
Exactly. Not guilty on anythimg and two people dead. brush Nov 2021 #31
Exactly Meowmee Nov 2021 #61
The prosecution was in a corner as far as the wounded survivor madville Nov 2021 #12
It would have been very strange sarisataka Nov 2021 #15
At the risk of sounding conspiratorial... Dr. Strange Nov 2021 #26
Not putting that guy on the stand would have been worse fescuerescue Nov 2021 #18
The fix was in from the get go nt doc03 Nov 2021 #35
the judge is a democrat thatdemguy Nov 2021 #41
Hard to believe he's a Democrat. Link pls. brush Nov 2021 #44
two links thatdemguy Nov 2021 #48
So what if he is a democrat, he is still a shit judge and that needs to be called out krawhitham Nov 2021 #45
Other than the video zoom issue Zeitghost Nov 2021 #52
The judge is an old white racist radius777 Nov 2021 #55
Do yo have proof of that? Zeitghost Nov 2021 #58
Justice and the law are two different things. radius777 Nov 2021 #59
You can not convict Zeitghost Nov 2021 #60
Even if, no. What is your real concern? marble falls Nov 2021 #46
My concern is thatdemguy Nov 2021 #51
Michael Flynn is a long time Democrat also JI7 Nov 2021 #54
+1. racist Dixiecrats who haven't changed their registration. /nt radius777 Nov 2021 #56
He was put on because if they didn't the defense would have. No way around it, just get ahead of it krawhitham Nov 2021 #43
Those two idiots mucked up ForgedCrank Nov 2021 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»IMO the prosecution in th...»Reply #29