Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: IMO the prosecution in the Riddenhouse trial was poor. Why did they put on... [View all]brush
(61,033 posts)33. Forget about not putting the wounded guy on. I'm no lawyer and don't know...
what can and can't be done. If you believe justice was done, we have noting to discuss.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
IMO the prosecution in the Riddenhouse trial was poor. Why did they put on... [View all]
brush
Nov 2021
OP
Are you kidding? You actually think that him saying he pointed a gun at the killer...
brush
Nov 2021
#16
Doing that would then open it up for the defense to bring up the past of Rosenbaum and Huber
DetroitLegalBeagle
Nov 2021
#39
Because people tend to divide into "Us or them" rather than truth and supporting evidence. n/t
Decoy of Fenris
Nov 2021
#50
Bad decision to put him on the stand. Why in the world would you put on a witness...
brush
Nov 2021
#9
So what if he is a democrat, he is still a shit judge and that needs to be called out
krawhitham
Nov 2021
#45