Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stuart G

(38,726 posts)
17. Thank You...That makes the decision clearer for me..While I don't agree, it does make things clearer
Fri Nov 19, 2021, 11:19 PM
Nov 2021

Thanks again for the explanation...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why let go? Ferrets are Cool Nov 2021 #1
Why was he "not convicted of murder"? Stuart G Nov 2021 #2
That I do not have the answer to Ferrets are Cool Nov 2021 #3
I guess you are correct..."jury of right wing nazis"..& a very stupid, self serving judge.. Stuart G Nov 2021 #4
There were people of color on that jury Polybius Nov 2021 #21
The black the Judge referred to. Historic NY Nov 2021 #31
Kin of Herman Cain? Ferrets are Cool Nov 2021 #48
Or maybe they saw something most of us didn't Polybius Nov 2021 #49
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2021 #33
Because the jury decided he acted in self-defense. I can understand disagreement with Gaugamela Nov 2021 #5
They believed he shot in self-defense as one of the guys leaped at him Marius25 Nov 2021 #14
The evidence pointed to it Sympthsical Nov 2021 #6
Thank You for a clear explanation of what the jury decided..Thanks again.. Stuart G Nov 2021 #7
And again... and again... and again... Solomon Nov 2021 #47
Can someone explain how his life was threatened that he had to use lethal force AlexSFCA Nov 2021 #8
His attorneys convinced the jury LeftInTX Nov 2021 #10
What evidence was suppressed? (n/t) Hav Nov 2021 #11
Judge said prosecutors could not call the victims, victims etc. LeftInTX Nov 2021 #12
That's not suppressing evidence Hav Nov 2021 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2021 #34
One was chasing him, got close Hav Nov 2021 #16
Thank You...That makes the decision clearer for me..While I don't agree, it does make things clearer Stuart G Nov 2021 #17
By that time they were trying to stop an active shooter Tribetime Nov 2021 #18
And they had good reasons for believing that Hav Nov 2021 #28
Remember when everyone was saying on TV Diraven Nov 2021 #38
Yep GPV Nov 2021 #44
Yes BeerBarrelPolka Nov 2021 #45
are those witness based facts or just testimony by the defendant? AlexSFCA Nov 2021 #20
Witnesses, victim testimony + video footage Hav Nov 2021 #23
Two are on video (the skateboard and the pointed gun) Polybius Nov 2021 #24
They were trying to take down an active shooter who had already killed someone. Progressive Jones Nov 2021 #25
Evidence given at trial says the guy (Rosenbaum) has said he was going to kill him... VarryOn Nov 2021 #27
Did you not watch the trial? PDT69 Nov 2021 #32
It's all on video. Tomconroy Nov 2021 #40
His life didn't have to be threatened in order to use self defense. Kaleva Nov 2021 #41
The good guy with the gun blinked Historic NY Nov 2021 #9
Who was the good guy with the gun? Devil Child Nov 2021 #13
Gaige Grosskreutz Frasier Balzov Nov 2021 #26
Grosskreutz was carrying an illegally concealed handgun that evening Devil Child Nov 2021 #29
Oh but the shooter wasn't Historic NY Nov 2021 #30
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2021 #36
But the guy the other day wasn't. Historic NY Nov 2021 #37
His gun was legal Diraven Nov 2021 #39
The charge was dropped because he was carrying a gun that exceeded the minimum length. Kaleva Nov 2021 #42
Please, Please...read post 16 by Hav.. It explains a lot.. Stuart G Nov 2021 #19
Because the prosecution H2O Man Nov 2021 #22
Post removed Post removed Nov 2021 #35
heard a few lawyers & analysists on a few shows today orleans Nov 2021 #43
He was convicted of nothing because the laws... Buckeye_Democrat Nov 2021 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Was Rittenhouse not convi...»Reply #17