Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Was Rittenhouse not convicted because ..."self defense"?...Why let go? I don't understand.. [View all]Stuart G
(38,726 posts)17. Thank You...That makes the decision clearer for me..While I don't agree, it does make things clearer
Thanks again for the explanation...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Was Rittenhouse not convicted because ..."self defense"?...Why let go? I don't understand.. [View all]
Stuart G
Nov 2021
OP
I guess you are correct..."jury of right wing nazis"..& a very stupid, self serving judge..
Stuart G
Nov 2021
#4
Because the jury decided he acted in self-defense. I can understand disagreement with
Gaugamela
Nov 2021
#5
Can someone explain how his life was threatened that he had to use lethal force
AlexSFCA
Nov 2021
#8
Thank You...That makes the decision clearer for me..While I don't agree, it does make things clearer
Stuart G
Nov 2021
#17
They were trying to take down an active shooter who had already killed someone.
Progressive Jones
Nov 2021
#25
Evidence given at trial says the guy (Rosenbaum) has said he was going to kill him...
VarryOn
Nov 2021
#27