Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Busterscruggs

(448 posts)
25. Hopefully
Sat Nov 20, 2021, 08:22 AM
Nov 2021

His friend will be charged with negligent homicide for allowing this 'child' to run loose with a deadly assault rifle with intent to kill black people. He just settled on some allies so I guess that was close enough for him. Just sickening.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Because he didn't carry the weapon across state lines. Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #1
How did he get that gun, then? Purchased it in Wisconsin? question everything Nov 2021 #3
His friend who was of age purchased and held it in Wisconsin. Sympthsical Nov 2021 #4
I'm not sure if I really understand this one fully. ForgedCrank Nov 2021 #12
Rittenhouse's money was used Sympthsical Nov 2021 #19
How did a 17 year old receive a stimulus check because Horse with no Name Nov 2021 #36
He was confusing it with unemployment Sympthsical Nov 2021 #38
So how did a part time seasonal job qualify for unemployment? Horse with no Name Nov 2021 #40
There are indoor pools Sympthsical Nov 2021 #41
Had it purchased for him in Wisconsin. Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #5
Making a straw purchase is a Federal offense sarisataka Nov 2021 #9
Well that guy's fucked for a good chunk of his life, and you know the DA will be out for blood. Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #10
Not much that the DA can do about it FBaggins Nov 2021 #23
Thank you. So it seems. question everything Nov 2021 #6
Of course. Truth should always take priority. n/t Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #8
I wouldn't call it gross misinformation. yardwork Nov 2021 #27
Because that never occurred Devil Child Nov 2021 #2
Because he never did sarisataka Nov 2021 #7
Even if he did Zeitghost Nov 2021 #11
Two things thatdemguy Nov 2021 #13
Thank you. As we see from other threads, a lot of misinformation. question everything Nov 2021 #14
A current post-trial theory is Rosenbaum was trying to "Suicide By Protest". Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #16
So the next 17 year old who walks into a high school with an automatic weapon can be acquitted? yardwork Nov 2021 #28
"Good guys with guns" has always been a myth. Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #29
I can't see that your post has any relevance to my question or the Rittenhouse case. yardwork Nov 2021 #30
Rittenhouse was -CLEARLY- fleeing. You'd have to have a lobotomy to think otherwise. Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #31
When he unloaded a second semiautomatic round into a wounded person on the ground? yardwork Nov 2021 #34
Post removed Post removed Nov 2021 #35
Oh bullshit. Rittenhouse didn't know who he was shooting. yardwork Nov 2021 #37
It came out at trial that he had a friend buy him a gun in Wisconsin and that he Bev54 Nov 2021 #20
His father getemjoe Nov 2021 #24
Used To Live In Kenosha ProfessorGAC Nov 2021 #26
Probably for the same reason the Germans weren't charged with bombing Pearl Harbor Jose Garcia Nov 2021 #15
The Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? PDT69 Nov 2021 #18
You know the answer to your question is "No." That's exactly the poster's point. littlemissmartypants Nov 2021 #22
Animal House reference Chili Nov 2021 #33
No he was not charged on that, the so obviously biased judge ruled in favor Meowmee Nov 2021 #17
He couldn't be charged with a something he didn't do and he didn't carry a weapon across Raine Nov 2021 #21
Hopefully Busterscruggs Nov 2021 #25
He used a straw buyer to get it for him in Wisconsin Bettie Nov 2021 #32
A 17-yr-old with an AR-15 goes to a volatile situation. Beartracks Nov 2021 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Stupid question but: was ...»Reply #25