Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Decoy of Fenris

(1,954 posts)
29. "Good guys with guns" has always been a myth.
Sat Nov 20, 2021, 09:57 AM
Nov 2021

I mean, sure, it happens, but as the Gun Control side of things so eloquently states, it -almost never- happens. At least not in appreciable numbers.

Let me phrase you an equally implausible scenario: A black man shoots up a (insert public space here), but then runs. Puts up his hands, turns tail and tries to flee. Are the police (Or Gods forbid a random citizen) "Good" to just shoot him in the back and gun him down when he's no active threat? How many times have we seen of "Innocent" (Read; Caught in the act of committing a crime/felony) people being shot in the back, and we endure days if not weeks of moaning and breastbeating about the "Injustice" of it all?

C'mon. Let's at least be honest here. No, that'd cause a MASSIVE outcry, rightfully so. Attacking a fleeing person is dishonorable, gross cowardice, and unworthy of civilized conversation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Because he didn't carry the weapon across state lines. Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #1
How did he get that gun, then? Purchased it in Wisconsin? question everything Nov 2021 #3
His friend who was of age purchased and held it in Wisconsin. Sympthsical Nov 2021 #4
I'm not sure if I really understand this one fully. ForgedCrank Nov 2021 #12
Rittenhouse's money was used Sympthsical Nov 2021 #19
How did a 17 year old receive a stimulus check because Horse with no Name Nov 2021 #36
He was confusing it with unemployment Sympthsical Nov 2021 #38
So how did a part time seasonal job qualify for unemployment? Horse with no Name Nov 2021 #40
There are indoor pools Sympthsical Nov 2021 #41
Had it purchased for him in Wisconsin. Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #5
Making a straw purchase is a Federal offense sarisataka Nov 2021 #9
Well that guy's fucked for a good chunk of his life, and you know the DA will be out for blood. Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #10
Not much that the DA can do about it FBaggins Nov 2021 #23
Thank you. So it seems. question everything Nov 2021 #6
Of course. Truth should always take priority. n/t Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #8
I wouldn't call it gross misinformation. yardwork Nov 2021 #27
Because that never occurred Devil Child Nov 2021 #2
Because he never did sarisataka Nov 2021 #7
Even if he did Zeitghost Nov 2021 #11
Two things thatdemguy Nov 2021 #13
Thank you. As we see from other threads, a lot of misinformation. question everything Nov 2021 #14
A current post-trial theory is Rosenbaum was trying to "Suicide By Protest". Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #16
So the next 17 year old who walks into a high school with an automatic weapon can be acquitted? yardwork Nov 2021 #28
"Good guys with guns" has always been a myth. Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #29
I can't see that your post has any relevance to my question or the Rittenhouse case. yardwork Nov 2021 #30
Rittenhouse was -CLEARLY- fleeing. You'd have to have a lobotomy to think otherwise. Decoy of Fenris Nov 2021 #31
When he unloaded a second semiautomatic round into a wounded person on the ground? yardwork Nov 2021 #34
Post removed Post removed Nov 2021 #35
Oh bullshit. Rittenhouse didn't know who he was shooting. yardwork Nov 2021 #37
It came out at trial that he had a friend buy him a gun in Wisconsin and that he Bev54 Nov 2021 #20
His father getemjoe Nov 2021 #24
Used To Live In Kenosha ProfessorGAC Nov 2021 #26
Probably for the same reason the Germans weren't charged with bombing Pearl Harbor Jose Garcia Nov 2021 #15
The Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? PDT69 Nov 2021 #18
You know the answer to your question is "No." That's exactly the poster's point. littlemissmartypants Nov 2021 #22
Animal House reference Chili Nov 2021 #33
No he was not charged on that, the so obviously biased judge ruled in favor Meowmee Nov 2021 #17
He couldn't be charged with a something he didn't do and he didn't carry a weapon across Raine Nov 2021 #21
Hopefully Busterscruggs Nov 2021 #25
He used a straw buyer to get it for him in Wisconsin Bettie Nov 2021 #32
A 17-yr-old with an AR-15 goes to a volatile situation. Beartracks Nov 2021 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Stupid question but: was ...»Reply #29