General Discussion

hlthe2b

(114,280 posts)

39. That he believes it worth looking into is worth far more than your derisive, dismissive and

Sat Nov 20, 2021, 10:35 AM

Nov 2021

contemptuous comment towards him. Perhaps those who are joining you in doing so would like to show your/their credentials for saying he doesn't know what he's talking about. ? Hmmm? His very long history of SUCCESS in the Supreme Court on constitutional issues speaks for itself and he deserves better. No one--or at least no one competent-- is going to make a determination without investigating all the issues and THAT is what he is calling for.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal charges being looked into for Rittenhouse... [View all] pbmus Nov 2021 OP

K&R Solly Mack Nov 2021 #1

The judge made this necessary. Baitball Blogger Nov 2021 #2

+1 Bluethroughu Nov 2021 #3

k and r for exposure..I sure hope that he is charged & somehow serves time. Stuart G Nov 2021 #4

Would view this more optimistically if someone could cite a specific federal law onenote Nov 2021 #5

Not sure what he could be charged with by DOJ madville Nov 2021 #7

Weapons charges. WestIndianArchie Nov 2021 #19

Specific federal statute, please? onenote Nov 2021 #21

That's what Nadler asked the DOJ to look into. Give them a minute. brush Nov 2021 #29

I'll give them more than a minute. But it won't matter. onenote Nov 2021 #37

He did not transport a weapon across state kelly1mm Nov 2021 #28

I guess we will see WestIndianArchie Nov 2021 #33

Don't see any chance of that. What government should do is pass tough gun laws. Hoyt Nov 2021 #6

Cumulative conclusions: Aussie105 Nov 2021 #60

Asking for a DOJ review isn't the same as what the title implies NickB79 Nov 2021 #8

Hard to see it... regnaD kciN Nov 2021 #9

Wouldn't that constitute Double Jeopardy? connecticut yankee Nov 2021 #10

They did it with the cops who beat Rodney King Polybius Nov 2021 #12

A "workaround" that doesn't apply FBaggins Nov 2021 #32

He DID claim to beacting as a security guard tho. CrackityJones75 Nov 2021 #47

That doesn't mean shit. Calista241 Nov 2021 #65

Not necessarily onenote Nov 2021 #13

Federal charges aren't typically counted with state charges re: double jeopardy Fiendish Thingy Nov 2021 #18

Jerry Nadler... Polybius Nov 2021 #11

I think this whole case Deuxcents Nov 2021 #14

Just wait. James48 Nov 2021 #15

K&R for, *my* problem with TRIBE is that he tells us what we want to hear UTUSN Nov 2021 #16

Because the most preeminent constitutional lawyer in this country could not possibly have a clue hlthe2b Nov 2021 #35

Well, his pre-eminence might have pointed to a specific statute onenote Nov 2021 #36

That he believes it worth looking into is worth far more than your derisive, dismissive and hlthe2b Nov 2021 #39

Apparently you don't realize that this isn't a "constitutional" issue onenote Nov 2021 #40

State laws can be in violation of the consitution. Do you not realize THAT? This goes beyond Kyle R. hlthe2b Nov 2021 #41

Goalposts moved. onenote Nov 2021 #42

NO, not at ALL. The issues around this case are major. hlthe2b Nov 2021 #43

I've thoroughly defended my position. onenote Nov 2021 #44

Been reading this thead CrackityJones75 Nov 2021 #49

Please take another look at the thread onenote Nov 2021 #56

Thanks for taking the time to respond in such detail. IANAL, so it was an educational back-and-forth TheRickles Nov 2021 #64

State criminal laws can indeed be ruled unconstitutional Zeitghost Nov 2021 #55

I wonder if civil rights charges are feasible? Fiendish Thingy Nov 2021 #17

No it is not. onenote Nov 2021 #22

onenote said it, no civil rights violation. Jon King Nov 2021 #24

It seems that an investigation is at least warranted... AntiFascist Nov 2021 #53

in 2016 llashram Nov 2021 #20

No chance, no federal laws apply. Jon King Nov 2021 #23

This is for both family's sanity. LiberatedUSA Nov 2021 #25

I don't see how this happens. iemanja Nov 2021 #26

No they are not Jose Garcia Nov 2021 #27

Not gonna hold my breath on this DetroitLegalBeagle Nov 2021 #30

They're playing to the crowd Sympthsical Nov 2021 #31

Karma will take care of him and his supporters. Sunsky Nov 2021 #34

I also join Chairman Nadler in that request. nt Roisin Ni Fiachra Nov 2021 #38

The problem is not Rittenhouse pinkstarburst Nov 2021 #45

In my government class after the holidays we cover the judicial branch Bucky Nov 2021 #46

Well, there was potentially an illegal straw purchase of the gun for Kyle-boy... Wounded Bear Nov 2021 #48

A straw purchase requires a transfer ripcord Nov 2021 #58

Rittenhouse went into this in depth during his direct testimony. Calista241 Nov 2021 #68

Bad idea and waste of time JI7 Nov 2021 #50

Move on manicdem Nov 2021 #51

What I dont understand- judge said victims were rioters and looters, in other words presumed Kashkakat v.2.0 Nov 2021 #52

Judge actually said they can be called rioters, etc., IF there is evidence of that. Hoyt Nov 2021 #67

That judge needs to be investigated. C Moon Nov 2021 #54

KR violated the victims' rights to peaceable assembly. Captain Zero Nov 2021 #57

That is not a crime Zeitghost Nov 2021 #59

Certainly, murder is a civil rights violation. jaxexpat Nov 2021 #61

Fingers crossed. Joinfortmill Nov 2021 #62

Unbelievable! Dreampuff Nov 2021 #63

18 USC 245 might work jmowreader Nov 2021 #66