Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(29,583 posts)

7. That part I understood. Famously ginned-up faux outrage.

Sun Nov 28, 2021, 12:06 PM

Nov 2021

I saw ‘pot’ and assumed it was a reference to cannabis - not a cooking vessel.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Heard today. [View all] kairos12 Nov 2021 OP

You heard it. Did you understand it? EYESORE 9001 Nov 2021 #1

you didn't ask me, but NJCher Nov 2021 #2

What story is that? EYESORE 9001 Nov 2021 #3

not marijuana, a culinary item NJCher Nov 2021 #4

Makes perfect sense now EYESORE 9001 Nov 2021 #6

That part I understood. Famously ginned-up faux outrage. EYESORE 9001 Nov 2021 #7