Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Holy Courtroom! Sonja Sotomayor just brought up a chilling observation! [View all]
The lawyer, Scott Stewart, argued a point about what is or isn't in the Constitution and Sotomayor pointed out that there was nothing in the Constitution that gave the Supreme Court the final word on determining the legal issues for this country.
Holy Moley! Is she giving us a hint, that the judgment of a politicized conservative court, doesn't have to be the last word?
Scott Stewart settled on history and tradition. Two issues that Conservatives do not have a strong foundation to work with, because they have been so wrong so many times, based on history. And since the nineties, they have been kicking our traditions in the nuts in order to get their way.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Holy Courtroom! Sonja Sotomayor just brought up a chilling observation! [View all]
Baitball Blogger
Dec 2021
OP
To me, that sounds like Sonja knows the Supreme Court will end up overturning Roe.
Claustrum
Dec 2021
#1
"Freedom in this country is not a birth right." Interesting. The terrorists were wrong?
jaxexpat
Dec 2021
#52
Repubs do NOT want a vote of the people on this one. A very clear majority want abortion legal. nt
albacore
Dec 2021
#10
What the people want doesn't matter much if republicans get to overturn elections. n/t
rainin
Dec 2021
#29
Scott Stewart, the lawyer representing Mississippi, was at the center of a 2017 abortion controversy
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2021
#32
Definitely the voters. But only if there is a secure and fair election process. Otherwise it is
KPN
Dec 2021
#36
The Cons love "tradition" because it protects White Male privilege. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2021
#17
I disagree. Kinda like they are the fiscal responsible or Christian, or pro life....
LizBeth
Dec 2021
#22
I don't see the Cons working to reduce White Male privilege or raise other other people. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2021
#28
Nor do I. You said they like traditional and I disagree. They will use it for white and male and
LizBeth
Dec 2021
#30
Exactly. The young vote will finally turnout against this religious minority.
lindysalsagal
Dec 2021
#53
If we forced them to tie federal funds to handle the childcare costs for women
Baitball Blogger
Dec 2021
#57