Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Holy Courtroom! Sonja Sotomayor just brought up a chilling observation! [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(71,395 posts)32. Scott Stewart, the lawyer representing Mississippi, was at the center of a 2017 abortion controversy
Scott Stewart, the lawyer representing Mississippi, was at the center of a 2017 abortion controversy.
Dec. 1, 2021, 8:45 a.m. ET 3 hours ago
3 hours ago
By Giulia Heyward
When a pregnant, undocumented 17-year-old staying in a federal refugee shelter in Texas sought an abortion in 2017, it was the job of Scott Stewart, then a Department of Justice lawyer, to help defend the ultimatum issued by the Trump administration: go through with the pregnancy or leave the country.
The girl had obtained a court order allowing her to have the procedure, but the government was preventing her from leaving the shelter for the appointment. That decision, Mr. Stewart argued, did not create an undue burden on the minor. She can get relief with voluntary departure, he argued.
A federal judge, declaring herself astounded by the argument, disagreed and ordered the government to allow the minor to go through with the abortion.
Mr. Stewart now finds himself once again at the center of a high-profile abortion case, one that may lead to one of the most consequential rulings on reproductive rights in decades.
{snip}
Mr. Stewart graduated from Princeton University and studied law at Stanford. He clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court and Judge Diarmuid F. OScannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He served in the U.S. Department of Justices Office of Legal Counsel and worked in private practice as a litigator. As deputy assistant attorney general in the Civil Division of the Justice Department, he presented more than 40 oral arguments in the federal courts of appeals.
Giulia Heyward is a 2021-2022 reporting fellow for the National desk. @giuliaheyward
Dec. 1, 2021, 8:45 a.m. ET 3 hours ago
3 hours ago
By Giulia Heyward
When a pregnant, undocumented 17-year-old staying in a federal refugee shelter in Texas sought an abortion in 2017, it was the job of Scott Stewart, then a Department of Justice lawyer, to help defend the ultimatum issued by the Trump administration: go through with the pregnancy or leave the country.
The girl had obtained a court order allowing her to have the procedure, but the government was preventing her from leaving the shelter for the appointment. That decision, Mr. Stewart argued, did not create an undue burden on the minor. She can get relief with voluntary departure, he argued.
A federal judge, declaring herself astounded by the argument, disagreed and ordered the government to allow the minor to go through with the abortion.
Mr. Stewart now finds himself once again at the center of a high-profile abortion case, one that may lead to one of the most consequential rulings on reproductive rights in decades.
{snip}
Mr. Stewart graduated from Princeton University and studied law at Stanford. He clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court and Judge Diarmuid F. OScannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He served in the U.S. Department of Justices Office of Legal Counsel and worked in private practice as a litigator. As deputy assistant attorney general in the Civil Division of the Justice Department, he presented more than 40 oral arguments in the federal courts of appeals.
Giulia Heyward is a 2021-2022 reporting fellow for the National desk. @giuliaheyward
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Holy Courtroom! Sonja Sotomayor just brought up a chilling observation! [View all]
Baitball Blogger
Dec 2021
OP
To me, that sounds like Sonja knows the Supreme Court will end up overturning Roe.
Claustrum
Dec 2021
#1
"Freedom in this country is not a birth right." Interesting. The terrorists were wrong?
jaxexpat
Dec 2021
#52
Repubs do NOT want a vote of the people on this one. A very clear majority want abortion legal. nt
albacore
Dec 2021
#10
What the people want doesn't matter much if republicans get to overturn elections. n/t
rainin
Dec 2021
#29
Scott Stewart, the lawyer representing Mississippi, was at the center of a 2017 abortion controversy
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2021
#32
Definitely the voters. But only if there is a secure and fair election process. Otherwise it is
KPN
Dec 2021
#36
The Cons love "tradition" because it protects White Male privilege. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2021
#17
I disagree. Kinda like they are the fiscal responsible or Christian, or pro life....
LizBeth
Dec 2021
#22
I don't see the Cons working to reduce White Male privilege or raise other other people. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2021
#28
Nor do I. You said they like traditional and I disagree. They will use it for white and male and
LizBeth
Dec 2021
#30
Exactly. The young vote will finally turnout against this religious minority.
lindysalsagal
Dec 2021
#53
If we forced them to tie federal funds to handle the childcare costs for women
Baitball Blogger
Dec 2021
#57