Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

usaf-vet

(7,779 posts)

16. Your opening statement is all that can or needs to be said. It doesn't matter any counter argument..

Reply to vlyons (Original post)

Sun Dec 5, 2021, 01:06 PM

Dec 2021

... just gets ignored. The GQP members are so brainwashed that nothing will change their warped views.

Another meme going around today also says it.

They complain about how uncomfortable it is to expect THEM to wear a mask for part of a day. Yet, at the same time, they argue that women should be able to carry a fetus to term and deliver it for adoption.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It doesn't matter [View all] vlyons Dec 2021 OP

If we take that as an absolute then Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #1

Thank You Oppaloopa Dec 2021 #2

the concept of vaccine mandates is misrepresented... Trueblue Texan Dec 2021 #3

Basically, I think you are saying that rights include duties, which I certainly agree with. Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #5

Vaccine mandates would not be invalidated Sogo Dec 2021 #4

I agree, thank you. Delmette2.0 Dec 2021 #12

☝☝☝This, absolutely!☝☝☝ ShazzieB Dec 2021 #25

It can still be an abosolute. A Pandemic that threatens all people is different. cayugafalls Dec 2021 #6

I agree with you, but... Trueblue Texan Dec 2021 #20

Correct. At this point, the mandate is optional. cayugafalls Dec 2021 #22

"weaponized virus" is a fave mantra of RW antivaxers. So you'd think they'd first in line for the Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #35

Never heard it myself from a rw'er, but I don't know any so, yea, there ya go. cayugafalls Dec 2021 #37

My mistake to not be more clear that I assumed yours & their usage were not the same. Peace too. nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #38

What if someone decided the birthrate was too high? leftstreet Dec 2021 #8

Nope. We don't have a monarchy or a dictatorship at this time. If we did, then all bets are off Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #13

The Qonned say the mRNA vaccines are a Gates-Soros-Fauci depopulation scheme Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #36

This message was self-deleted by its author uponit7771 Dec 2021 #19

✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ msfiddlestix Dec 2021 #34

In effect, forcing a woman to bear a child she does not want means the state controls her body. Lonestarblue Dec 2021 #7

They also put fetuses above the life a fetus becomes Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2021 #29

DURec leftstreet Dec 2021 #9

Yes. Sogo Dec 2021 #10

K&R. nt DLevine Dec 2021 #11

Good discussion! cilla4progress Dec 2021 #14

I tend to think about abortion in terms of when life begins, only.... Trueblue Texan Dec 2021 #21

Absolutely agree! Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2021 #30

A fetus is NOT a baby. Got that? TeamProg Dec 2021 #15

Your opening statement is all that can or needs to be said. It doesn't matter any counter argument.. usaf-vet Dec 2021 #16

I would just change one word... ShazzieB Dec 2021 #26

I guess we have to remember when they put people on trial Dan Dec 2021 #17

That analysis doesn't work completely for me Silent3 Dec 2021 #18

The problem is the fundies don't care if the woman dies Farmer-Rick Dec 2021 #27

I absolutely know fundies don't care Silent3 Dec 2021 #33

Like in the case of my neighbor LittleGirl Dec 2021 #32

Great post malaise Dec 2021 #23

Religious evils codified into law to kill and maim women Nululu Dec 2021 #24

So true Farmer-Rick Dec 2021 #28

Beyond that Roy Rolling Dec 2021 #31