Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Poor turnout by Democratic base voters ensured McAuliffe defeat in Virginia [View all]
Last edited Wed Dec 8, 2021, 09:06 AM - Edit history (1)
Its safe to say the quickly congealing conventional wisdom about Glenn Youngkins victory in the Virginia gubernatorial contest in November was that the moderate-seeming (albeit Trump-endorsed) Republican won by flipping suburban voters who forsook the Democratic Party out of concerns over public-school closures and woke curricula and also Joe Bidens economic policies.
Back on November 5, I dissented from this judgment, suggesting that disparate turnout patterns, long the curse of Democrats when they control the White House, may have been the real story. But my evidence for this proposition came from exit polls, and some political analysts refuse to put much stock in those.
Now comes some more granular data from political scientists Seth Hill and Dan Hopkins via FiveThirtyEight, and it seems to confirm that poor turnout by Democratic base voters defeated Terry McAuliffe more than ambivalent swing voters. It was heavily pro-Biden precincts that delivered the governors seat to the GOP, they write. More specifically, analysis of every Virginia precinct shows that McAuliffe underperformed Joe Bidens 2020 margins by 592,000 in precincts Biden carried with at least 70 percent of the vote, while in those same precincts Youngkin fell short of Trumps vote by only 124,000 votes. Both candidates had significantly slighter (and more equal) falloff from their presidential-candidate predecessors in more competitive and Trump-dominated precincts; indeed, Youngkin actually got slightly more votes than Trump in precincts the former president carried with at least 70 percent of the vote. This latter data point, however, confirms the general impression that the election was a battle of the bases that Youngkin handily won. And thats exactly what the exit polls showed.
Back on November 5, I dissented from this judgment, suggesting that disparate turnout patterns, long the curse of Democrats when they control the White House, may have been the real story. But my evidence for this proposition came from exit polls, and some political analysts refuse to put much stock in those.
Now comes some more granular data from political scientists Seth Hill and Dan Hopkins via FiveThirtyEight, and it seems to confirm that poor turnout by Democratic base voters defeated Terry McAuliffe more than ambivalent swing voters. It was heavily pro-Biden precincts that delivered the governors seat to the GOP, they write. More specifically, analysis of every Virginia precinct shows that McAuliffe underperformed Joe Bidens 2020 margins by 592,000 in precincts Biden carried with at least 70 percent of the vote, while in those same precincts Youngkin fell short of Trumps vote by only 124,000 votes. Both candidates had significantly slighter (and more equal) falloff from their presidential-candidate predecessors in more competitive and Trump-dominated precincts; indeed, Youngkin actually got slightly more votes than Trump in precincts the former president carried with at least 70 percent of the vote. This latter data point, however, confirms the general impression that the election was a battle of the bases that Youngkin handily won. And thats exactly what the exit polls showed.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/12/swing-voters-dont-explain-why-youngkin-won.html
ETA: The fact that only 35% of Democratic voters believe that democracy in America is under threat should be all the proof one needs that we have to sounding the alarm much louder and more frequently. In the corporate world, this is typically defined as an "area of opportunity"!
https://www.grinnell.edu/news/52-americans-believe-democracy-facing-major-threat
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Poor turnout by Democratic base voters ensured McAuliffe defeat in Virginia [View all]
bullwinkle428
Dec 2021
OP
It doesn't matter what sort of candidate McAuliffe was...vote blue. Any GOP is a million times
Demsrule86
Dec 2021
#4
True, but still very much a cautionary tale for the 2022 Midterms. Proves how
bullwinkle428
Dec 2021
#6
Carville is a washed-up, RW talking point-spewing has-been, living off swamp gas fumes from the 90's
Celerity
Dec 2021
#11
Ahhh..Larry Summers! BTW, how is that new "anti-woke" university that he's
bullwinkle428
Dec 2021
#13
Wow, I had forgotten that Summers was involved with that RW project. What a POS.
Celerity
Dec 2021
#16
Just curious. What was the turnout percentage in the Dem primary? (If you know).
Doremus
Dec 2021
#24
We almost always do it to ourselves. We need to clog the polls every election.
marble falls
Dec 2021
#2
Democrats need to combat all the lies and fearmongering that the GQP have . ...
Lovie777
Dec 2021
#8
The myth that the Democratic base AND Republican voters are secretly democratic socialists
betsuni
Dec 2021
#40
Wrong!! That's not what "base" means. The Democratic BASE are the LOYAL voters who ALWAYS turn out...
NurseJackie
Dec 2021
#38
Just as a personal note, I was in high school when Ronald Reagan came to power,
bullwinkle428
Dec 2021
#44
Exactly, the "base" is anywhere from 60-80% of Democrats, depending upon who is defining them....
George II
Dec 2021
#50
Selfish people who don't vote do not get the privilege of calling themselves the "base"...
NurseJackie
Dec 2021
#49
Ed Kilgore is the author. It looks like there is a limited number of free articles
bullwinkle428
Dec 2021
#43