Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

W_HAMILTON

(10,030 posts)
17. Oh bullshit.
Wed Dec 8, 2021, 11:35 AM
Dec 2021

This is a familiar refrain, often from the exact type of people that don't turn out in these elections that cost us these elections, just so they can deflect blame from their own (in)action.

McAuliffe won his Democratic primary by more than 40%. If there some better mythical candidate out there, Democrats sure didn't want him/her. They wanted McAuliffe.

Contrast that with Youngkin, who was installed in the position by Republican elites rather than going through the typical primary process.

If McAuliffe were such a bad candidate, he wouldn't have been overwhelmingly selected by Virginia primary voters in an OPEN primary and if Youngkin were such a great candidate, he wouldn't have needed to be selected by the Republican Party political elite to be gifted the nomination because he couldn't win the nomination if left up to the voters.

And yet Youngkin won and McAuliffe did not.

Why? Because Republicans voted for their candidate regardless and -- as often is the case in these sorts of closely contested elections that Republicans almost always seem to eke out -- just enough Democrats failed to turn out and vote for the Democrat, as this article posits.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Occam's Razor, IMO, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #1
It doesn't matter what sort of candidate McAuliffe was...vote blue. Any GOP is a million times Demsrule86 Dec 2021 #4
It matters to the voters. PTWB Dec 2021 #18
It doesn't matter to *YOU* Act_of_Reparation Dec 2021 #53
True, but still very much a cautionary tale for the 2022 Midterms. Proves how bullwinkle428 Dec 2021 #6
I notice people tend to project their own issues AZProgressive Dec 2021 #7
Carville is a washed-up, RW talking point-spewing has-been, living off swamp gas fumes from the 90's Celerity Dec 2021 #11
Ahhh..Larry Summers! BTW, how is that new "anti-woke" university that he's bullwinkle428 Dec 2021 #13
Wow, I had forgotten that Summers was involved with that RW project. What a POS. Celerity Dec 2021 #16
Oh bullshit. W_HAMILTON Dec 2021 #17
Just curious. What was the turnout percentage in the Dem primary? (If you know). Doremus Dec 2021 #24
No, I don't right offhand, but... W_HAMILTON Dec 2021 #59
McAuliffe WAS a BAD candidate. Tommymac Dec 2021 #25
Thank You. nt Progressive Jones Dec 2021 #45
JMHO, but second acts generally don't Deminpenn Dec 2021 #28
We almost always do it to ourselves. We need to clog the polls every election. marble falls Dec 2021 #2
+1 nitpicker Dec 2021 #14
This does make more sense than the conventional wisdom AZProgressive Dec 2021 #3
Some still are. Caliman73 Dec 2021 #34
Not sure I'm 100% with this analysis, Calista241 Dec 2021 #5
Trumpkin also overperformed in tRump leaning counties south of Route 17 Best_man23 Dec 2021 #12
Democrats need to combat all the lies and fearmongering that the GQP have . ... Lovie777 Dec 2021 #8
Absolutely. Kid Berwyn Dec 2021 #9
People wanted schools open so they don't have to watch their kids JI7 Dec 2021 #10
He also told parents to stay out of education jimfields33 Dec 2021 #20
Got a link on that? Kingofalldems Dec 2021 #26
Lol. You seriously haven't heard this after being one of the most active jimfields33 Dec 2021 #29
He didn't tell parents to stay out of education. Kingofalldems Dec 2021 #31
I just found out from the Moonie Times. Kingofalldems Dec 2021 #36
See 21 on this very thread. jimfields33 Dec 2021 #30
See 33 on this very thread. Kingofalldems Dec 2021 #35
Ahh-here it is from the Moonie Times: Kingofalldems Dec 2021 #33
Here it is from the Washington Post Caliman73 Dec 2021 #37
McAuliffe fell over himself when governor to please Dominion Energy Mysterian Dec 2021 #15
anti votes carry the day in the majority of off-season elections bigtree Dec 2021 #19
Got a link to that statistical info on off-season elections? Mysterian Dec 2021 #23
. bigtree Dec 2021 #27
Maybe. But I'm blaming messaging. Grins Dec 2021 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author traitorsgalore Dec 2021 #22
Virginians voted Republican iemanja Dec 2021 #32
The myth that the Democratic base AND Republican voters are secretly democratic socialists betsuni Dec 2021 #40
Wrong!! That's not what "base" means. The Democratic BASE are the LOYAL voters who ALWAYS turn out... NurseJackie Dec 2021 #38
+1000 sheshe2 Dec 2021 #39
The base doesn't have to be "inspired" to turn out to vote. lapucelle Dec 2021 #41
Just as a personal note, I was in high school when Ronald Reagan came to power, bullwinkle428 Dec 2021 #44
Yup. RobinA Dec 2021 #51
So is the base shrinking? leftstreet Dec 2021 #46
We win elections by appealing to the center, not the extremes. NurseJackie Dec 2021 #47
Exactly, the "base" is anywhere from 60-80% of Democrats, depending upon who is defining them.... George II Dec 2021 #50
Is it "center" to tell parents to stay out of school decisions? leftstreet Dec 2021 #54
He already covered this. But I'm sure you knew that too. NurseJackie Dec 2021 #55
I agree with your analysis LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2021 #48
Selfish people who don't vote do not get the privilege of calling themselves the "base"... NurseJackie Dec 2021 #49
Brava! JustAnotherGen Dec 2021 #56
Well said! treestar Dec 2021 #57
Who wrote this article? It's behind a pay wall so can't read the byline. George II Dec 2021 #42
Ed Kilgore is the author. It looks like there is a limited number of free articles bullwinkle428 Dec 2021 #43
No. "The base" votes dependably. That's why they're called the base. Hortensis Dec 2021 #52
The last sentence. Yes. That. Indeed. NurseJackie Dec 2021 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poor turnout by Democrati...»Reply #17