Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
9. oh, you mean illegal stuff involving non-adults.
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 09:09 PM
Jan 2012

Excellent. By drawing a bright unequivocal line between that which is acceptable (material for and involving consenting adults) and that which is not (anything else) anonymous is displaying excellent internet citizenship and doing what, I suspect, technically challenged governments are seriously behind the curve on.

I'm sure the implied conflation in your OP headline with the vast majority of 'porn', which is by and for consenting adults, was a simple oversight. Right?

Nevertheless, on the off chance you're nurturing some kind of secret fantasy that anonymous is going to try to stop, or is even against, the legal adult variety of "porn", I'd say you haven't been over to 4chan lately.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

GOOD! William769 Jan 2012 #1
very good work! limpyhobbler Jan 2012 #2
Excellent! Laurian Jan 2012 #3
Should probably have included the "CHILD" part in the headline Prophet 451 Jan 2012 #4
"4. Should probably have included the "CHILD" part in the headline" greiner3 Jan 2012 #21
Good Point ihavenobias Jan 2012 #25
Seriously, I was about to say: "Now they've gone too far!" EOTE Jan 2012 #27
Agree. Reading the headline I just thought "why??" - but this is GOOD! nt gateley Jan 2012 #30
I wish there would be a follow-up story on how many pop up after justiceischeap Jan 2012 #5
Have you seen the great work by http://protect.org/ proverbialwisdom Jan 2012 #16
Why can't law enforcement agencies do the same thing? Canuckistanian Jan 2012 #6
Interesting question treestar Jan 2012 #8
... LadyHawkAZ Jan 2012 #11
it would be interesting to see who the clients are notadmblnd Jan 2012 #7
Here's a website where you can meet the clients. Kablooie Jan 2012 #18
oh, you mean illegal stuff involving non-adults. Warren DeMontague Jan 2012 #9
they are my heroes roguevalley Jan 2012 #10
NOW they've done it! xfundy Jan 2012 #12
Like I said, anyone who thinks anonymous is "anti-porn", has never been to 4chan. Warren DeMontague Jan 2012 #20
Two BIG thumbs up Raine Jan 2012 #13
Standing Ovation for ANONYMOUS! BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2012 #14
Well done, Anonymous! Spazito Jan 2012 #15
Excellent. Amazing why the govt won't do this. nt valerief Jan 2012 #17
The authorities can't do it the way Anonymous does because it would taint the evidence Occulus Jan 2012 #22
I think you hit the nail on the head, there. nt MADem Jan 2012 #24
5200 Pentagon Employees Purchased Child Pornography - Pentagon will still Not respond to Congress Poll_Blind Jan 2012 #19
you'd think the DOJ might take an interest in this eShirl Jan 2012 #23
Well done! (nt) Kellerfeller Jan 2012 #26
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #28
Salute! quinnox Jan 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hacker Group Anonymous Ta...»Reply #9