Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: NoShit.... [View all]

Celerity

(54,465 posts)
23. Now you are goalpost moving, as it is a carve-out that has been under discussion for months, not
Thu Dec 9, 2021, 05:53 PM
Dec 2021

a complete removal of it.

Very few are still holding out hope for a actual complete removal at this point, myself included.


There are more than 2 Democrats who are against removing the filibuster. Some of those are willing to go to a talking-filibuster.


Manchin shot down the 'talking filibuster' and multiple other options that would have the power to end the 60 vote requirement, almost 9 months ago.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142714005 Wed Mar 17, 2021,

Sen. Joe Manchin, the most conservative member of the Senate Democratic caucus, has spent the past couple of weeks doling out cryptic hints that he might be open to changing filibuster rules that currently allow the Republican minority to block most legislation unless a bill is supported by at least 60 senators.

On Wednesday, however, he appeared to shut the door on several ideas floated by proponents of filibuster reform within the Senate. Manchin’s latest move does not mean that filibuster reform is dead, but it does suggest that Democrats who wish to make it easier to enact legislation may struggle to come up with a strong package of reforms that will win Manchin’s support.

Earlier this month, Manchin told Meet the Press’s Chuck Todd that he’s open to making the filibuster “a little bit more painful” for the minority, and that he might be willing to make senators “stand there and talk” if they wish to maintain a filibuster. The West Virginia senator, in other words, appeared open to a so-called “talking filibuster,” where senators who wish to block legislation must speak continuously on the Senate floor in order to maintain a filibuster.

...

And Manchin’s newly stated opposition to burden shifting — that is, moving to requiring 41 senators to sustain a filibuster instead of requiring 60 senators to break one — is a particularly significant blow to reform efforts. Burden shifting, combined with other reforms such as a talking filibuster, could have imposed very potent limits on the minority’s power to obstruct legislation.






a month later

Sen. Joe Manchin Rules Out Support for Weakened Senate Filibuster

West Virginia Democrat calls for bipartisanship rather than rule changes

https://www.wsj.com/articles/sen-joe-manchin-rules-out-support-for-weakened-senate-filibuster-11617848294

WASHINGTON—Sen. Joe Manchin, a pivotal centrist, further closed the door on the prospect that he could support any move to end the filibuster in the Senate, a rule change that would allow his party to pass legislation with a simple majority rather than the 60 votes needed for most bills.

“I have said it before and will say it again to remove any shred of doubt: There is no circumstance in which I will vote to eliminate or weaken the filibuster,” he said in an opinion article posted on the Washington Post website Wednesday evening.

Mr. Manchin (D., W.Va.) and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D., Ariz.) have previously said they would block the party from eliminating the filibuster, even as pressure builds from party lawmakers and activists eager to advance their agenda on gun control, voting rights, immigration and the minimum wage, which have little support among Republicans.





Opinion: Joe Manchin: I will not vote to eliminate or weaken the filibuster

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/joe-manchin-filibuster-vote/2021/04/07/cdbd53c6-97da-11eb-a6d0-13d207aadb78_story.html



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NoShit.... [View all] pbmus Dec 2021 OP
No clue. Hints? Is there text that could be posted? An image that could be posted? Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #1
You can't see the tweet? Elessar Zappa Dec 2021 #3
I use a twitter blocking technique. Tetrachloride Dec 2021 #29
here Celerity Dec 2021 #4
Thank you! Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #11
yw! Celerity Dec 2021 #12
More Reich BS of the type that helped defeat Clinton in 2016. Hoyt Dec 2021 #2
how is THIS Celerity Dec 2021 #5
Reich is criticizing Democrats, in case you have not noticed. He did the same leading up to 2016, Hoyt Dec 2021 #6
Frankly, I don't give two shits about which side of the aisle you stand.. pbmus Dec 2021 #8
Not only that, but nothing Reich said in that short tweet is criticising Democrats. Celerity Dec 2021 #10
Not opposing voting rights. I do think Reich needs to shut up about fillibuster because Hoyt Dec 2021 #13
That in no way explains how what he said was in any way that would you first claimed, and now Celerity Dec 2021 #9
Celerity, yes he is criticizing Democrats for not removing filibuster. Typical Reich comment. Hoyt Dec 2021 #14
Hundreds of elected Dems, thousands of pundits and journos, and millions of Dem voters Celerity Dec 2021 #18
Sorry, I trust our leaders to do the right thing. I get there are plenty who don't trust them. Hoyt Dec 2021 #19
Now you are goalpost moving, as it is a carve-out that has been under discussion for months, not Celerity Dec 2021 #23
Be careful. I got 2 hides for saying much less about those two. onecaliberal Dec 2021 #20
I get it. If I get alerts because I question Reich, it'll just have to be. Hoyt Dec 2021 #24
I do not think dpibel Dec 2021 #31
I said nothing that's against TOS, and I never called (here or before) Manchin or Sinema nasty Celerity Dec 2021 #25
I didn't call them names either. Just pointed out why they're voting how they are. onecaliberal Dec 2021 #28
Well, I would need to see your posts in order to make a fair judgement, feel free to PM me Celerity Dec 2021 #30
Okay Hoyt. Get ready to play the wounded party. jaxexpat Dec 2021 #15
What, for telling Reich to quit bashing Dems who think it best not to remove filibuster. Hoyt Dec 2021 #16
Baloney. He's for rationality. jaxexpat Dec 2021 #21
Like I said, Obama, Clinton, and Biden don't seek his counsel. You can call me a "troll," but Hoyt Dec 2021 #22
He made it clear to both of them what as at stake. jaxexpat Dec 2021 #33
Think they understand it, without Reich's sophomoric BS. Hoyt Dec 2021 #34
Wow, nice personal attack. Smh. nt BlackSkimmer Dec 2021 #35
You are making things up dpibel Dec 2021 #32
Reich has pulled backhanded junk since 1996, and may well have cost Clinton the election in 2016. Hoyt Dec 2021 #37
So you are making things up dpibel Dec 2021 #38
Are you going to provide us data supporting your assertion? Torchlight Dec 2021 #39
Well, for one thing Reich openly criticized Obama and Clinton right up to the 2016 election Hoyt Dec 2021 #40
Criticism does not directly lead to what you asserted. Torchlight Dec 2021 #41
Yeah, when you provide data that Reich agreeing with trump's Hoyt Dec 2021 #42
You made an assertion. I did not. Torchlight Dec 2021 #43
I have no data that trump is a racist or Sanders would have lost in 2020. BUT Hoyt Dec 2021 #44
See that envelope icon up there by your avatar? dpibel Dec 2021 #45
Previously, I have had Gungeoneers and Jackpine Radicals discuss me privately. Hoyt Dec 2021 #46
You are once again making things up dpibel Dec 2021 #48
OK. I suppose you didn't get a private email from others, even though you said you did. Hoyt Dec 2021 #49
You are doing yourself no favors dpibel Dec 2021 #50
;-{)🖖‍ Goonch Dec 2021 #7
We really need voting rights passed before the midterms. KS Toronado Dec 2021 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author malaise Dec 2021 #26
K & R n/t malaise Dec 2021 #27
K&R n/t ChazII Dec 2021 #36
k&r Demovictory9 Dec 2021 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NoShit....»Reply #23