Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NoShit.... [View all]Celerity
(54,475 posts)23. Now you are goalpost moving, as it is a carve-out that has been under discussion for months, not
a complete removal of it.
Very few are still holding out hope for a actual complete removal at this point, myself included.
There are more than 2 Democrats who are against removing the filibuster. Some of those are willing to go to a talking-filibuster.
Manchin shot down the 'talking filibuster' and multiple other options that would have the power to end the 60 vote requirement, almost 9 months ago.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142714005 Wed Mar 17, 2021,
Sen. Joe Manchin, the most conservative member of the Senate Democratic caucus, has spent the past couple of weeks doling out cryptic hints that he might be open to changing filibuster rules that currently allow the Republican minority to block most legislation unless a bill is supported by at least 60 senators.
On Wednesday, however, he appeared to shut the door on several ideas floated by proponents of filibuster reform within the Senate. Manchins latest move does not mean that filibuster reform is dead, but it does suggest that Democrats who wish to make it easier to enact legislation may struggle to come up with a strong package of reforms that will win Manchins support.
Earlier this month, Manchin told Meet the Presss Chuck Todd that hes open to making the filibuster a little bit more painful for the minority, and that he might be willing to make senators stand there and talk if they wish to maintain a filibuster. The West Virginia senator, in other words, appeared open to a so-called talking filibuster, where senators who wish to block legislation must speak continuously on the Senate floor in order to maintain a filibuster.
...
And Manchins newly stated opposition to burden shifting that is, moving to requiring 41 senators to sustain a filibuster instead of requiring 60 senators to break one is a particularly significant blow to reform efforts. Burden shifting, combined with other reforms such as a talking filibuster, could have imposed very potent limits on the minoritys power to obstruct legislation.
Link to tweet
a month later
Sen. Joe Manchin Rules Out Support for Weakened Senate Filibuster
West Virginia Democrat calls for bipartisanship rather than rule changes
https://www.wsj.com/articles/sen-joe-manchin-rules-out-support-for-weakened-senate-filibuster-11617848294
WASHINGTONSen. Joe Manchin, a pivotal centrist, further closed the door on the prospect that he could support any move to end the filibuster in the Senate, a rule change that would allow his party to pass legislation with a simple majority rather than the 60 votes needed for most bills.
I have said it before and will say it again to remove any shred of doubt: There is no circumstance in which I will vote to eliminate or weaken the filibuster, he said in an opinion article posted on the Washington Post website Wednesday evening.
Mr. Manchin (D., W.Va.) and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D., Ariz.) have previously said they would block the party from eliminating the filibuster, even as pressure builds from party lawmakers and activists eager to advance their agenda on gun control, voting rights, immigration and the minimum wage, which have little support among Republicans.
I have said it before and will say it again to remove any shred of doubt: There is no circumstance in which I will vote to eliminate or weaken the filibuster, he said in an opinion article posted on the Washington Post website Wednesday evening.
Mr. Manchin (D., W.Va.) and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D., Ariz.) have previously said they would block the party from eliminating the filibuster, even as pressure builds from party lawmakers and activists eager to advance their agenda on gun control, voting rights, immigration and the minimum wage, which have little support among Republicans.
Opinion: Joe Manchin: I will not vote to eliminate or weaken the filibuster
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/joe-manchin-filibuster-vote/2021/04/07/cdbd53c6-97da-11eb-a6d0-13d207aadb78_story.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No clue. Hints? Is there text that could be posted? An image that could be posted?
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2021
#1
Reich is criticizing Democrats, in case you have not noticed. He did the same leading up to 2016,
Hoyt
Dec 2021
#6
Not only that, but nothing Reich said in that short tweet is criticising Democrats.
Celerity
Dec 2021
#10
Not opposing voting rights. I do think Reich needs to shut up about fillibuster because
Hoyt
Dec 2021
#13
That in no way explains how what he said was in any way that would you first claimed, and now
Celerity
Dec 2021
#9
Celerity, yes he is criticizing Democrats for not removing filibuster. Typical Reich comment.
Hoyt
Dec 2021
#14
Hundreds of elected Dems, thousands of pundits and journos, and millions of Dem voters
Celerity
Dec 2021
#18
Sorry, I trust our leaders to do the right thing. I get there are plenty who don't trust them.
Hoyt
Dec 2021
#19
Now you are goalpost moving, as it is a carve-out that has been under discussion for months, not
Celerity
Dec 2021
#23
I said nothing that's against TOS, and I never called (here or before) Manchin or Sinema nasty
Celerity
Dec 2021
#25
I didn't call them names either. Just pointed out why they're voting how they are.
onecaliberal
Dec 2021
#28
Well, I would need to see your posts in order to make a fair judgement, feel free to PM me
Celerity
Dec 2021
#30
What, for telling Reich to quit bashing Dems who think it best not to remove filibuster.
Hoyt
Dec 2021
#16
Like I said, Obama, Clinton, and Biden don't seek his counsel. You can call me a "troll," but
Hoyt
Dec 2021
#22
Reich has pulled backhanded junk since 1996, and may well have cost Clinton the election in 2016.
Hoyt
Dec 2021
#37
Well, for one thing Reich openly criticized Obama and Clinton right up to the 2016 election
Hoyt
Dec 2021
#40