General Discussion

malaise

(293,245 posts)

51. THIS

Reply to JohnSJ (Reply #2)

Tue Dec 14, 2021, 06:52 AM

Dec 2021

That is all

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rachel said it tonight, [View all] gab13by13 Dec 2021 OP

Keep in mind that Bannon's trial ... Whiskeytide Dec 2021 #1

If Cheney is getting primaried by these Trumpers, she'll take their gawd down with her. TheBlackAdder Dec 2021 #5

How do they know what the DOJ is doing. I don't think they announce what they are doing JohnSJ Dec 2021 #2

+1 2naSalit Dec 2021 #3

Ditto! BigmanPigman Dec 2021 #12

You may ne right, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #24

THIS malaise Dec 2021 #51

THIS malaise Dec 2021 #52

There are two ways to convict: kentuck Dec 2021 #4

Have you listened to the audio conversation gab13by13 Dec 2021 #22

That's being investigated by the Georgia AG Mr.Bill Dec 2021 #29

Good point, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #40

Very curious, isn't it? Baitball Blogger Dec 2021 #6

I've seen enough. AG Garland was a hugh mistake. WTF's he doing up there? Dude can kiss my ass. steampunk Dec 2021 #7

I agree Poiuyt Dec 2021 #9

Have you noticed that after Schiff's initial wnylib Dec 2021 #39

Welcome to DU orangecrush Dec 2021 #33

Rachel said. sheshe2 Dec 2021 #8

oh brother Grasswire2 Dec 2021 #10

???? sheshe2 Dec 2021 #11

You mean the Oxford & Stanford grad? :) Laura PourMeADrink Dec 2021 #16

I read her bio just to make sure I knew how educated she is. Grasswire2 Dec 2021 #17

Just trying to give a 2nd opinion other than mine, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #13

Aside from wait and see what else would you have us do? CrackityJones75 Dec 2021 #55

Link? Beastly Boy Dec 2021 #14

Link to Rachel's show? gab13by13 Dec 2021 #18

Link to Rachel's quote. You are referring to something that Rachel stated. Beastly Boy Dec 2021 #38

She said both. gab13by13 Dec 2021 #41

Clearly, our views of what she said diverge. That's why I asked for a quote in the first place. Beastly Boy Dec 2021 #42

Hey wait and see crowd, answer me this; gab13by13 Dec 2021 #15

And how exactly do you know what they are doing or not doing? relayerbob Dec 2021 #21

Did any federal authority refer Mark Meadows for prosecution by DOJ? Beastly Boy Dec 2021 #26

Where does it say that DOJ needs a referral? gab13by13 Dec 2021 #44

Here, for instance: Beastly Boy Dec 2021 #48

Congress has to review the allegation Mr.Bill Dec 2021 #31

I am *hoping* that DOJ is waiting for Congress to Laura PourMeADrink Dec 2021 #19

I am hoping the same thing. ShazzieB Dec 2021 #23

Nope, I don't think so, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #27

You're right. Did she say anything about the FBI investigating? Laura PourMeADrink Dec 2021 #36

Good catch, thank you, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #45

Ya and I'm not sure what the exact distinction is since FBI Laura PourMeADrink Dec 2021 #47

Mueller already sid that in 10 counts of obstruction Fullduplexxx Dec 2021 #50

She worries about everything relayerbob Dec 2021 #20

Well, remember back when Michael Cohen spent time in jail, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #30

I trust Dr. Maddow's opinion orangecrush Dec 2021 #34

Mark Meadows, indicted and frogmarched for Christmas... pioche4 Dec 2021 #25

The House will vote tomorrow gab13by13 Dec 2021 #32

Regarding Garland indicting Bannon wnylib Dec 2021 #49

IF the DOJ is investigating, it's the most secret, leak proof investigation involving politicians neverforget Dec 2021 #28

Yup orangecrush Dec 2021 #35

Maybe there is a very robust and thorough investigation going on. Baked Potato Dec 2021 #37

Maybe I am the Queen of France. Scrivener7 Dec 2021 #54

Kicking for visability SheltieLover Dec 2021 #43

Is Garland a secret Trump fanboy? Kablooie Dec 2021 #46

A question for the "Leave Merrick garland ALOOOOOOOONE!!" crowd: It has been a year Scrivener7 Dec 2021 #53

Has anyone thought that the fact that we can't know about investigations is part of the problem? hydrolastic Dec 2021 #56