Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rachel said it tonight, [View all]hydrolastic
(542 posts)56. Has anyone thought that the fact that we can't know about investigations is part of the problem?
I mean all someone has to do is take over the DOJ and you now control everything, OH yea that already happened.....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If Cheney is getting primaried by these Trumpers, she'll take their gawd down with her.
TheBlackAdder
Dec 2021
#5
How do they know what the DOJ is doing. I don't think they announce what they are doing
JohnSJ
Dec 2021
#2
I've seen enough. AG Garland was a hugh mistake. WTF's he doing up there? Dude can kiss my ass.
steampunk
Dec 2021
#7
Clearly, our views of what she said diverge. That's why I asked for a quote in the first place.
Beastly Boy
Dec 2021
#42
IF the DOJ is investigating, it's the most secret, leak proof investigation involving politicians
neverforget
Dec 2021
#28
A question for the "Leave Merrick garland ALOOOOOOOONE!!" crowd: It has been a year
Scrivener7
Dec 2021
#53
Has anyone thought that the fact that we can't know about investigations is part of the problem?
hydrolastic
Dec 2021
#56