Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Squad was right to vote against infrastructure bill Part 3: Manchin a NO on BBB [View all]JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)12. and end up passing nothing, because that is what would have happened. I fail to understand why some
keep arguing the same frustrations over and over again. The rigidity of Manchin and Sinema on the filibuster, and how much they were willing go on the bills should not be a surprise at this stage. This is the reality of what we have.
Whether we like it or not, they will be defining the constraints of these bills.
However, the advantage we have at this time because we have the majority in the Senate, is that we have at least two years to make as many judicial appoints as become available, including the Supreme Court.
In the meantime the focus needs to be on winning at least a two seat majority in the Senate, and a majority in the House, which should help neutralize the issues we are having now
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
138 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Squad was right to vote against infrastructure bill Part 3: Manchin a NO on BBB [View all]
wellst0nev0ter
Dec 2021
OP
Similarly, progressives need moderates or they stand little chance of winning elections.
TexasTowelie
Dec 2021
#127
A maximum pressure campaign on Manchinema would have gotten earlier passage
wellst0nev0ter
Dec 2021
#5
What does the "Democratic Majority for Israel" have to do with pressuring Manchin. There are about
JohnSJ
Dec 2021
#31
You are the one who brought up using the "Democratic Majority for Israel", as a PAC against Manchin,
JohnSJ
Dec 2021
#41
and end up passing nothing, because that is what would have happened. I fail to understand why some
JohnSJ
Dec 2021
#12
There is no false narritive, this is what a 50-50 Senate is. Until we achieve at least a two seat
JohnSJ
Dec 2021
#37
I would argue you have not presented one viable option that would get Manchin or Sinema to change
JohnSJ
Dec 2021
#50
It's been said before, but if Stein hadn't been on the ballot, those 1%ers would've stayed home.
TheRickles
Dec 2021
#83
There is also no universe where Manchin will vote for the expanded programs in the BBB.
TexasTowelie
Dec 2021
#30
Yup. Now, children will suffer and the planet will deteriorate until at least 2025
Fiendish Thingy
Dec 2021
#35
Well, unless Manchin caves in, we shall see if the people who told me all we need to cruise to
Celerity
Dec 2021
#40
Not a "right wing narrative", just a fact you dont like. CBO says it adds 160 billion.
oldsoftie
Dec 2021
#137
Once again, I consider the conclusion that you reached to be erroneous and actually it is also
TexasTowelie
Dec 2021
#107
You're correct, I shouldn't have interchanged the Squad with progressives.
TexasTowelie
Dec 2021
#126
Joe Mansion turns out to be a water boy for the wealthy...what a surprise, not.
pecosbob
Dec 2021
#92
The squad is either gets BBB or gets to be right. What clever political maneuvering.
mathematic
Dec 2021
#100
+++. Should have learned that in 2000, and because we didn't, 2016 changed the whole dynamic
JohnSJ
Dec 2021
#112
Yes, and the only way to make them irrelevant is to gain at least a two seat majority in the Senate
JohnSJ
Dec 2021
#114
Oh, there's always a reason to somehow find a racial aspect for everything these days.
oldsoftie
Dec 2021
#138