Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Elon Musk DID pay taxes this year - Once again, it's all relative [View all]tenderfoot
(8,982 posts)6. Yeah, they're just jealous

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The M$M doesn't talk about ETRs because it'll hit their millionaire pockets too if they have to
uponit7771
Dec 2021
#1
When you sell shares you pay taxes. There is no tax on capital gains till then.
BSdetect
Dec 2021
#2
They don't pay direct capital gains tax on their houses capital gain until they sell
BSdetect
Dec 2021
#43
Yes, sir. Fatal flaw in the Twitter argument ? ... ASSETS are not taxed, aside from property
Alexander Of Assyria
Dec 2021
#38
No argument there. My point was simply the Twitter persons Twitterpost is factually distorted.
Alexander Of Assyria
Dec 2021
#51
How so? Look like ordinary people in fancy blazers, maybe I missed something?
Alexander Of Assyria
Dec 2021
#39
Idolize is strawman argument . Admire for his vision and fortitude, can we do that?
Alexander Of Assyria
Dec 2021
#41
He also lost over $50 billion in 2 days. She fails to mention that, of course.
oldsoftie
Dec 2021
#36
Yes sir, a lot gets left out in any one Twitter post. As intended I guess.
Alexander Of Assyria
Dec 2021
#42
I'd hate to have to pay on my 401K before I take out a dime at 59 1/2 eligible.
jimfields33
Dec 2021
#13
True, but nobody talks about this for non-billionaires. Your slippery slope argument is valid though
Lucky Luciano
Dec 2021
#45
So then you'd want the government owning shares? Yeah, THAT wouldnt affect legislation at all.....
oldsoftie
Dec 2021
#35
To minimize market impact only. The government can then slowly unwind the position...
Lucky Luciano
Dec 2021
#40
It's complex, but something to run with. A straight up wealth tax is otherwise bad.
Lucky Luciano
Dec 2021
#90
It may be relative, but its also fair if the Government doesn't change the tax rules.
brooklynite
Dec 2021
#75