Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If a CEO offers a member of Congress $5 to vote for a bill, it's considered a bribe - [View all]NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)32. That's an awfully broad brush you're painting with...
https://www.aclu.org/lobbying-decisionmakers
More perspective at the link above.
Lobbying has a bad image. Some of it is deserved. But lobbying is not necessarily something to avoid. Quite the contrary, lobbying can be a socially responsible thing to do. What is more, you have probably been a lobbyist before, in one form or another -- even though you may not have used that label. And if you've never lobbied for a cause, maybe you ought to learn how; so that if and when the time is right you can be an effective lobbyist, in a way that is doable and ethical for you.
What do we mean by lobbying? By lobbying, we mean persuading someone with more decision-making power than you, in a particular situation, to take a course of action that you support. It's that simple. No more (or less) than that.
"Lobbying" is a broad term. The people you lobby, the decision-makers, can vary widely. Much (though not all) lobbying is political, and involves persuading political decision-makers. On a local level, this could mean a member of the town council, or the head of the zoning board, or the director of the library. It could also be a state representative, or a holder of higher elected or appointed office.
But the decision-makers need not be in politics. They could be the editors of newspapers, the ministers of churches, the presidents of hospitals, the CEO's of businesses, a college board of trustees, or the officers of a volunteer organization. These people make decisions, too. And if you want to persuade them, in a real sense you'll be lobbying, in a broad but accurate meaning of the term.
What do we mean by lobbying? By lobbying, we mean persuading someone with more decision-making power than you, in a particular situation, to take a course of action that you support. It's that simple. No more (or less) than that.
"Lobbying" is a broad term. The people you lobby, the decision-makers, can vary widely. Much (though not all) lobbying is political, and involves persuading political decision-makers. On a local level, this could mean a member of the town council, or the head of the zoning board, or the director of the library. It could also be a state representative, or a holder of higher elected or appointed office.
But the decision-makers need not be in politics. They could be the editors of newspapers, the ministers of churches, the presidents of hospitals, the CEO's of businesses, a college board of trustees, or the officers of a volunteer organization. These people make decisions, too. And if you want to persuade them, in a real sense you'll be lobbying, in a broad but accurate meaning of the term.
More perspective at the link above.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If a CEO offers a member of Congress $5 to vote for a bill, it's considered a bribe - [View all]
Uncle Joe
Dec 2021
OP
End the corruption the most crazy decision in Supreme Court history unleashed.
Alexander Of Assyria
Dec 2021
#21
That version (H.R.5175) passed the House during the 111th United States Congress 10 years ago.
lapucelle
Dec 2021
#56
Your point that the current bill passed the House and died in the Senate does not remain the same.
lapucelle
Dec 2021
#60
but money IS free speech and corporations are individuals, some with religious sensibilities.
Thomas Hurt
Dec 2021
#5
He certainly did, and so did Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. This is not a "revolutionary" idea.
George II
Dec 2021
#18
Why bother, it has no chance of passing the Senate...maybe they should concentrate on BBB
Demsrule86
Dec 2021
#85
For the record, Justice Democrats and Sunrise Movement now are Super-PACs and.....
George II
Dec 2021
#10
Chakrabarti, Zack Exley, Kyle Kulinski, and Cenk Uygur are the founders of Justice Democrats.
lapucelle
Dec 2021
#28
Justice Democrats AND their affiliated group, Sunrise Movement, converted to Carey committees....
George II
Dec 2021
#36
The article is report about a superpac's haul. Isn't "cash dash" some sort of contest or lottery?
lapucelle
Dec 2021
#93
Justice Democrats superpac did not spend one dime against Republicans in the last cycle.
lapucelle
Dec 2021
#80
JD's ability to spend unlimited funds against Democrats is a direct result of Citizens United.
lapucelle
Dec 2021
#81
Why would Justice Democrat's be spending money AGAINST this Democrat in 2020?
lapucelle
Dec 2021
#82
Strangers (well-meaning or otherwise) are not entitled to define who I do and do not
lapucelle
Dec 2021
#44
Please look into the background behind Justice Democrats and how they've operated.
George II
Dec 2021
#50
Any change of that died in 16...with the Trump pics on SCOTUS, no legislation will matter and
Demsrule86
Dec 2021
#86
Members of the House and Senate can receive up to $50 in gifts or dinner.
former9thward
Dec 2021
#69
Do you feel the same way about the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and their lobbying activities?
NurseJackie
Dec 2021
#33
Any suggestion on just how to proceed to overturn Citizens United? I see that rallying cry....
George II
Dec 2021
#37
I would have started by NOT bashing HRC so much in 2016 that trump was able to
Eliot Rosewater
Dec 2021
#47
How was Clinton NOT "connected" in 2016, and just WHY are you bringing up the 2016 primary here?
George II
Dec 2021
#61
I am of the opinion that Hillary would have beat Trump had she been the only candidate to run.
Demsrule86
Dec 2021
#87
I refuse to respond to or communicate with people who helped trump, but there is a post
Eliot Rosewater
Dec 2021
#54
You and I differ as to how and why Trump came to power and you're on the OP I started.
Uncle Joe
Dec 2021
#55
Unfortunately YOU feel that trump came into power because of a woman who President Obama....
George II
Dec 2021
#68
Well, there is this data from the general election. Maybe that's the "hard truth"?
lapucelle
Dec 2021
#74
I don't want to refight the primary... so I can't really reply except to point out
Demsrule86
Dec 2021
#83
And in the case of WVA, the person who wins the primary has no chance of winning the General.
Demsrule86
Dec 2021
#97
That's very interesting, but the data cited about the Sanders to Trump voters
lapucelle
Dec 2021
#101
I have no idea what you are talking about...my point was some vote for candidates in a
Demsrule86
Dec 2021
#104
Are you suggesting that those Sanders to Trump voters were GOP ratfuckers? nt
SunSeeker
Jan 2022
#105