Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(61,031 posts)
24. If you use the median as average, you effectively disenfranchised half the people
Mon Jan 3, 2022, 02:20 PM
Jan 2022

Including the most successful. This would preclude not just those, like FDR, who was born wealthy, but people like Frank Lautenberg, the son of two immigrants whose dad worked as a laborer in Patterson, NJ's silk mills. Frank fought in WWII and went to college on the GI bill. He was one of the founders of ADP. He then sought the Senate seat and was a very strong advocate for labor unions. I heard him speak at a county Democratic picnic explaining why strong OSHA laws were personal to him. His dad and uncle had told their children they needed an education to avoid the mills, where you could see filaments floating in the air. They intuitively knew this would harm them. Both died young per the Senator. Yet, he was a multimillionaire when he ran for Senate. Would you reject him?

Not to mention, what about someone whose wealth changes? Let's say someone is elected as a single person and then marries. Must he or she resign if they then exceed the amount?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Plus the bribes and insider trading. Irish_Dem Jan 2022 #1
I agree OLDMDDEM Jan 2022 #2
Exactly. Look how many start out middle class... VarryOn Jan 2022 #7
Yep. Go to congress poor and come out rich. Irish_Dem Jan 2022 #10
Dunno about that. Their primary job is fundraising, and a good... TreasonousBastard Jan 2022 #3
Uh oh Beatlelvr Jan 2022 #6
Yeah, how much does Sean Hannity make? Tucker Carlson? Walleye Jan 2022 #4
Hmmm OLDMDDEM Jan 2022 #5
Sweet gig. Sits on his ass and talks all day has no responsibility for anything Walleye Jan 2022 #8
It's really not very much. The insider trading is the real issue. YorkRd Jan 2022 #9
$174k is too much money for a couple hundred of the most important jobs on the planet? mathematic Jan 2022 #11
I don't disagree OLDMDDEM Jan 2022 #12
Senators don't get a minute off the entire year. They are always "on call". mathematic Jan 2022 #13
Let's not exaggerate. former9thward Jan 2022 #16
Tell that to my Representative and Senators MagickMuffin Jan 2022 #26
"On call" means that they can be called into work at any time under exceptional circumstances mathematic Jan 2022 #30
Most important job on the planet? inthewind21 Jan 2022 #21
Completely disagree mcar Jan 2022 #14
I'm with you wryter2000 Jan 2022 #19
TX thought it was clever to pay its state reps very, very little. It just made them very corrupt. eppur_se_muova Jan 2022 #32
That's right. mcar Jan 2022 #33
It is hard to say if $174K is too much for them to make. It is a lot of money dugog55 Jan 2022 #15
Much like working burger joints and waiting tables, serving in office isn't meant to be a career. tenderfoot Jan 2022 #17
I do not agree karynnj Jan 2022 #18
I think OLDMDDEM Jan 2022 #20
If you use the median as average, you effectively disenfranchised half the people karynnj Jan 2022 #24
No inthewind21 Jan 2022 #23
Ridiculous post. maxsolomon Jan 2022 #22
Just Silly ProfessorGAC Jan 2022 #25
I agree OLDMDDEM Jan 2022 #27
Perhaps $174k Is A Reason ProfessorGAC Jan 2022 #28
You make a good point. OLDMDDEM Jan 2022 #29
Disagree. Now if you want to talk their bullshit insider trading being allowed, then I agree. Celerity Jan 2022 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They make way too much mo...»Reply #24