Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

niyad

(132,270 posts)

13. And whose, not who's.

Reply to mahina (Reply #6)

Wed Jan 5, 2022, 11:41 AM

Jan 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Possibly the most informative thread on Omicron ever [View all] AntivaxHunters Jan 2022 OP

Yay. But they need some editor's Achilleaze Jan 2022 #1

They sure do. mahina Jan 2022 #6

And whose, not who's. niyad Jan 2022 #13

There is always a taint when an article is written in Republicanese DFW Jan 2022 #34

Some good stuff on there. Hugin Jan 2022 #2

Meh YP_Yooper Jan 2022 #8

Dr. Malone is a controversial figure to say the least. I can't figure Tomconroy Jan 2022 #11

Agreed when he starts to opine about what public health policy should be YP_Yooper Jan 2022 #21

The Atlantic is also skeptical of Dr. Malone. femmedem Jan 2022 #22

Thank you for the link YP_Yooper Jan 2022 #23

Thanks for reading and replying! femmedem Jan 2022 #25

change your user name lapfog_1 Jan 2022 #3

+1 leftstreet Jan 2022 #17

Thank you for the work you're doing and sharing information here. femmedem Jan 2022 #4

I don't know who these people are but I don't think they Tomconroy Jan 2022 #5

I ran through the material YP_Yooper Jan 2022 #9

I'm weighing your reading vs. the NIH, Scientific American, the Lancet, Scrivener7 Jan 2022 #15

Not sure what you mean YP_Yooper Jan 2022 #18

This message was self-deleted by its author Scrivener7 Jan 2022 #20

Unsure why you think it's weird AntivaxHunters Jan 2022 #19

As far as I can tell your big issue is Covid has to be eliminated. Tomconroy Jan 2022 #24

Our goal is to fight against Covid misinformation AntivaxHunters Jan 2022 #26

Why don't you identify yourself and state what your qualifications Tomconroy Jan 2022 #27

Because many of us AntivaxHunters Jan 2022 #28

Then you're just another anonymous person on the internet. Tomconroy Jan 2022 #29

I think you are misreading this site BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #31

Thanks -- a lot of good info with links to REAL peer reviewed journal articles JT45242 Jan 2022 #7

The OP is an example of misinformation (ie misleading about the facts) YP_Yooper Jan 2022 #12

Lol. Scrivener7 Jan 2022 #16

"And sadly, that includes Democrats too who have fallen to the grift of far right antivax doctor's.. FSogol Jan 2022 #10

Really? OneGrassRoot Jan 2022 #30

In 2 sentences BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #32

I should probably be more specific... OneGrassRoot Jan 2022 #33

Thank you for clarifying BumRushDaShow Jan 2022 #35

Yes, yes about the horseshoe effect. Absolutely. n/t OneGrassRoot Jan 2022 #36

Yes, this is all generally my observation. I've seen this across the Hortensis Jan 2022 #37

The thread does have links from excellent sources. And I have heard even some Scrivener7 Jan 2022 #14

Both of my grandmothers went blind from childhood scarlet fever. lindysalsagal Jan 2022 #38