Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Former US Attorney: Garland Critics Are 'Silly' [View all]
https://crooksandliars.com/2022/01/chuck-rosenberg-merrick-garland-dojFormer US Attorney: Garland Critics Are 'Silly'
Chuck Rosenberg, who should know, praised Garland and the DOJ as working "rather rapidly" in the investigation into the insurrection.
59
By Aliza Worthington January 5, 2022
snip//
"Well, I actually think, Hallie, they're moving rather rapidly," said Rosenberg. "I think criticism that they're not moving quickly enough is silly."
He elaborated, "I mean they've charged 725 people in under a year. As I mentioned before, they have 300,000 tips to work through and 15 terabytes of data. Also, we don't know what they're doing behind the scenes."
Then he explained why Garland is proceeding exactly as he should be. "Because he's saying, 'We're on it. We're working. Be patient. Justice takes time.' The worst thing you could do, Hallie, is rush to charge somebody. You have to charge when you have the requisite facts and the law supports the charge, when you could bring a case in court, and you can win it, and sustain it on appeal. And that takes time."
If Chuck Rosenberg called me "silly" I'd be embarrassed and ashamed. He is the calmest, sanest, and easily one of the most knowledgable people on the planet when it comes to prosecuting cases in this nation. He headed the Drug Enforcement Agency, spent years as a U.S. Attorney, was a top official in the FBI, and was chief of staff to a Deputy Attorney General of the United States.
If Chuck Rosenberg tells me to calm the f*ck down, I'm gonna calm the f*ck down.
This is your reminder that Merrick Garlands investigation of Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols and the Unabomber had zero leaks before indictments,100% convictions and no turnovers on appeal. Sometimes you have to have a little faith in the process. Happy Wednesday.
𝐁𝐞𝐤𝐬 (@antifaoperative) January 5, 2022
𝐁𝐞𝐤𝐬 (@antifaoperative) January 5, 2022
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thank you very much for your intelligent and reasonable comments! I hope that others learn...
NurseJackie
Jan 2022
#24
Need to find that quote from one of those people from the capital police who testified
Laura PourMeADrink
Jan 2022
#35
If I remember correctly, "Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols and the Unabomber"......
jaxexpat
Jan 2022
#4
Screw ppl who counsel patience? Disagree. Patience is the touchstone of justice, and
Alexander Of Assyria
Jan 2022
#5
"Some really don't understand how complex criminal investigations work" You are correct, but...
Escurumbele
Jan 2022
#10
Point of order. Can you imagine organizing and collating all that material, only some of
Alexander Of Assyria
Jan 2022
#66
Looking into others minds and motivations and the future with such precision is a real skill.
Alexander Of Assyria
Jan 2022
#67
Nicely written. However I see the prosecutions of he ringleaders as very much a complex legal
Alexander Of Assyria
Jan 2022
#69
This is getting ridiculous. As I stated, my point was that by this stage, blah, blah, blah.
jaxexpat
Jan 2022
#55
Your words " If I remember correctly...Unabomber"......were in custody by this point..."
we can do it
Jan 2022
#60
Best line yet! "(People who) think their little pep talks somehow assuage the concerns
Laura PourMeADrink
Jan 2022
#46
"What scared me was Garland's statement about his not being a partisan AG..." I believe he felt
Escurumbele
Jan 2022
#12
The impediment to this is that there are no Democrats to equalize the prosecution.
jaxexpat
Jan 2022
#26
Watergate had special prosecutor less than a yr after plumber arrest. J6 Concerns are rational
uponit7771
Jan 2022
#49
Look, I like Rosenberg and largely agree with him, but I'd be remiss not to mention his Bill Barr
hlthe2b
Jan 2022
#27
This is STILL the best we can do: hope that there will be justice at some point.
Scrivener7
Jan 2022
#43
FACT NOT IN DISPUTE: There was Watergate special counsel less than a year ...
uponit7771
Jan 2022
#39
I'm not concerned about the speed so much as the scope and intensity.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
Jan 2022
#61