Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kid Berwyn

(22,789 posts)
13. Just-us Roboto
Fri Jan 7, 2022, 12:53 PM
Jan 2022
Florida 2000? John Roberts was there

Bush (II) gets to name a Supreme Court justice because he sits in the White House.
The man he has chosen helped put him there in the first place.


By TIM GRIEVE
Salon, PUBLISHED JULY 21, 2005

Republicans railing against Democrats' "obstructionist tactics" in the Senate return again and again to a phrase they like to use: "Elections have consequences." What they mean, of course, is that George W. Bush won the White House, and to that victor go the spoils.

It's not a bad way to frame the argument, the separation of powers and the Constitution's "advice and consent" clause notwithstanding. But when it comes to Bush's nominee to the Supreme Court, there's a bit of a circular quality to it: John G. Roberts helped Bush become the victor in the first place -- and not just by giving a grand to the first Bush-Cheney campaign. As the Los Angeles Times is reporting today, Roberts traveled in the fall of 2000 to the sunny state of Florida, where he played a mostly behind-the-scenes role in helping Bush prevail in the legal fight that followed the disputed presidential election.

Republican lawyers who worked on the recount told the Times that Roberts advised Florida Gov. Jeb Bush on the role that he and the Florida Legislature could play in the fight over the recounting of ballots. "Mr. Roberts, one of the preeminent constitutional attorneys in the country, came to Florida in 2000 at his own expense and met with Gov. Bush to share what he believed the governor's responsibilities were under federal law after a presidential election and a presidential election under dispute," Jeb Bush spokesman Jacob DiPietre told the Times. "Judge Roberts was one of several experts who came to Florida to share their ideas. The governor appreciated his willingness to serve and valued his counsel."

Working on the recount is hardly disqualifying -- as the Times notes, just about every leading constitutional-law type was involved in the case somehow -- but Roberts' role does raise some questions about whether he's really the nonpartisan lawyer and jurist that his proponents would make him out to be. "What's interesting is that only now is it coming to the fore that John Roberts was part of that," People for the American Way President Ralph Neas told the Times. "He always created an impression of being above the political fray, being part of the Washington legal establishment, but not of partisan politics."

Continues…

https://www.salon.com/2005/07/21/florida_33/

Time after time, the record shows the GOP can’t win without cheating.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Excellent. Nt spooky3 Jan 2022 #1
"Ummmm... they did." Ohio Joe Jan 2022 #2
It's even better.....2 of the anti-vax attorneys are appearing remotely cuz they have Covid Nevilledog Jan 2022 #19
"it was passed over 50 years ago. Besides, it doesn't mention COVID-19 by name." Pantagruel Jan 2022 #3
Paraphrased, but yup, he kept repeating those two invalid points and even realized he was lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #6
That is really disturbing PatSeg Jan 2022 #23
Maybe he can be forced to retire. LiberalFighter Jan 2022 #37
Makes one want to scream, right? The chief justice voicing such stupidity. brush Jan 2022 #26
He got there by spending his career fighting voting rights. They always reward the voting rights Solomon Jan 2022 #27
i remember that 90-percent Jan 2022 #50
I think I made an error. lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #4
a dimwit or nitwit n/t. airplaneman Jan 2022 #40
Or "He thinks he's a real wit. But he's only half right." (Seen on toilet stall.) erronis Jan 2022 #45
Or lackwit.a great word popular in Elizabeth I's time, I believe. niyad Jan 2022 #52
Sounds like Justice Roberts either need remedial reading lessons... TheRealNorth Jan 2022 #5
Pretty dim bulb NewHendoLib Jan 2022 #7
A real jackass, opening the door to more deaths JohnSJ Jan 2022 #8
Almost unimaginably stupid. highplainsdem Jan 2022 #9
Wait....if they say no mandates Bettie Jan 2022 #10
That's his plan. lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #14
FFS...what next? Bettie Jan 2022 #15
That sucks. Pretty much means the mandate is dead. Drunken Irishman Jan 2022 #11
Not A Half-Wit, Sir, An ideologue Who sees His Chance The Magistrate Jan 2022 #12
It's like no one wants to take any accountability or something n/t leftstreet Jan 2022 #21
A gifted author wrote, over 40 years ago: DFW Jan 2022 #30
Just-us Roboto Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 #13
Don't forget. And Kavanaugh was one of the rioters storming the vote count offices. I think they Solomon Jan 2022 #53
K & R Duppers Jan 2022 #16
K&R for visibility. crickets Jan 2022 #17
GOP wants to kill us off. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2022 #18
Well, it's mostly Republicans that are dying now.... TheRealNorth Jan 2022 #20
If the supremes gut OSHA, it will be the non-union workers in the south that end up dead. LiberalArkie Jan 2022 #28
God! We are so screwed. That's the chief justice voicing such stupidity. Maybe his term... brush Jan 2022 #22
I guess the War Powers Act, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations Act, the Immigration AZLD4Candidate Jan 2022 #24
CJ is signalling stare decisis is dead /nt bucolic_frolic Jan 2022 #25
Unfortunately, Roberts seems to believe that corporations should run the government, Lonestarblue Jan 2022 #29
Fascist fill the courts with the dumbest people they can find, just like they do with politicians. n yaesu Jan 2022 #31
What a fking idiot rockfordfile Jan 2022 #32
Do laws have a sale date on them mr. roberts? spanone Jan 2022 #33
This should be a reckoning to expand the court with questions like this from this turbinetree Jan 2022 #34
Bushie appointee said "Racism is dead" when he knows better but won't admit it. czarjak Jan 2022 #35
The Bible doesn't mention America either. Probatim Jan 2022 #36
Robert is a halfwit? Being kinda of generous, aren't we? Ray Bruns Jan 2022 #38
Too much by half. nt Xipe Totec Jan 2022 #39
Quarter-wit? Eighth-wit? lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #41
the toe-nail i chopped off my LEFT big toe is smarter than Justice Robbbbberts Trueblue1968 Jan 2022 #42
That's why Dubya picked'im peppertree Jan 2022 #44
Once again, a reminder that Obama SHOULD be the Chief Justice. peppertree Jan 2022 #43
Your "transcript" is not true. former9thward Jan 2022 #46
Thank you. Claiming Roberts said OSHA "doesn't count anymore" is misleading... CaptainTruth Jan 2022 #48
He should retire. Nt DoBotherMe Jan 2022 #47
Do you really think misspelling his name deliberately MineralMan Jan 2022 #49
Yes, a reminder how he got the job and how he uses it. lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #54
He's not an idiot. He's doing it on purpose. The GOPee 6 are Hassler Jan 2022 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chief Injustice Robberts ...»Reply #13