Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chief Injustice Robberts is a halfwit. [View all]Kid Berwyn
(22,789 posts)13. Just-us Roboto
Florida 2000? John Roberts was there
Bush (II) gets to name a Supreme Court justice because he sits in the White House.
The man he has chosen helped put him there in the first place.
By TIM GRIEVE
Salon, PUBLISHED JULY 21, 2005
Republicans railing against Democrats' "obstructionist tactics" in the Senate return again and again to a phrase they like to use: "Elections have consequences." What they mean, of course, is that George W. Bush won the White House, and to that victor go the spoils.
It's not a bad way to frame the argument, the separation of powers and the Constitution's "advice and consent" clause notwithstanding. But when it comes to Bush's nominee to the Supreme Court, there's a bit of a circular quality to it: John G. Roberts helped Bush become the victor in the first place -- and not just by giving a grand to the first Bush-Cheney campaign. As the Los Angeles Times is reporting today, Roberts traveled in the fall of 2000 to the sunny state of Florida, where he played a mostly behind-the-scenes role in helping Bush prevail in the legal fight that followed the disputed presidential election.
Republican lawyers who worked on the recount told the Times that Roberts advised Florida Gov. Jeb Bush on the role that he and the Florida Legislature could play in the fight over the recounting of ballots. "Mr. Roberts, one of the preeminent constitutional attorneys in the country, came to Florida in 2000 at his own expense and met with Gov. Bush to share what he believed the governor's responsibilities were under federal law after a presidential election and a presidential election under dispute," Jeb Bush spokesman Jacob DiPietre told the Times. "Judge Roberts was one of several experts who came to Florida to share their ideas. The governor appreciated his willingness to serve and valued his counsel."
Working on the recount is hardly disqualifying -- as the Times notes, just about every leading constitutional-law type was involved in the case somehow -- but Roberts' role does raise some questions about whether he's really the nonpartisan lawyer and jurist that his proponents would make him out to be. "What's interesting is that only now is it coming to the fore that John Roberts was part of that," People for the American Way President Ralph Neas told the Times. "He always created an impression of being above the political fray, being part of the Washington legal establishment, but not of partisan politics."
Continues
https://www.salon.com/2005/07/21/florida_33/
Time after time, the record shows the GOP cant win without cheating.
Bush (II) gets to name a Supreme Court justice because he sits in the White House.
The man he has chosen helped put him there in the first place.
By TIM GRIEVE
Salon, PUBLISHED JULY 21, 2005
Republicans railing against Democrats' "obstructionist tactics" in the Senate return again and again to a phrase they like to use: "Elections have consequences." What they mean, of course, is that George W. Bush won the White House, and to that victor go the spoils.
It's not a bad way to frame the argument, the separation of powers and the Constitution's "advice and consent" clause notwithstanding. But when it comes to Bush's nominee to the Supreme Court, there's a bit of a circular quality to it: John G. Roberts helped Bush become the victor in the first place -- and not just by giving a grand to the first Bush-Cheney campaign. As the Los Angeles Times is reporting today, Roberts traveled in the fall of 2000 to the sunny state of Florida, where he played a mostly behind-the-scenes role in helping Bush prevail in the legal fight that followed the disputed presidential election.
Republican lawyers who worked on the recount told the Times that Roberts advised Florida Gov. Jeb Bush on the role that he and the Florida Legislature could play in the fight over the recounting of ballots. "Mr. Roberts, one of the preeminent constitutional attorneys in the country, came to Florida in 2000 at his own expense and met with Gov. Bush to share what he believed the governor's responsibilities were under federal law after a presidential election and a presidential election under dispute," Jeb Bush spokesman Jacob DiPietre told the Times. "Judge Roberts was one of several experts who came to Florida to share their ideas. The governor appreciated his willingness to serve and valued his counsel."
Working on the recount is hardly disqualifying -- as the Times notes, just about every leading constitutional-law type was involved in the case somehow -- but Roberts' role does raise some questions about whether he's really the nonpartisan lawyer and jurist that his proponents would make him out to be. "What's interesting is that only now is it coming to the fore that John Roberts was part of that," People for the American Way President Ralph Neas told the Times. "He always created an impression of being above the political fray, being part of the Washington legal establishment, but not of partisan politics."
Continues
https://www.salon.com/2005/07/21/florida_33/
Time after time, the record shows the GOP cant win without cheating.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's even better.....2 of the anti-vax attorneys are appearing remotely cuz they have Covid
Nevilledog
Jan 2022
#19
"it was passed over 50 years ago. Besides, it doesn't mention COVID-19 by name."
Pantagruel
Jan 2022
#3
Paraphrased, but yup, he kept repeating those two invalid points and even realized he was
lagomorph777
Jan 2022
#6
He got there by spending his career fighting voting rights. They always reward the voting rights
Solomon
Jan 2022
#27
Or "He thinks he's a real wit. But he's only half right." (Seen on toilet stall.)
erronis
Jan 2022
#45
Don't forget. And Kavanaugh was one of the rioters storming the vote count offices. I think they
Solomon
Jan 2022
#53
If the supremes gut OSHA, it will be the non-union workers in the south that end up dead.
LiberalArkie
Jan 2022
#28
God! We are so screwed. That's the chief justice voicing such stupidity. Maybe his term...
brush
Jan 2022
#22
I guess the War Powers Act, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations Act, the Immigration
AZLD4Candidate
Jan 2022
#24
Unfortunately, Roberts seems to believe that corporations should run the government,
Lonestarblue
Jan 2022
#29
Fascist fill the courts with the dumbest people they can find, just like they do with politicians. n
yaesu
Jan 2022
#31
This should be a reckoning to expand the court with questions like this from this
turbinetree
Jan 2022
#34
Bushie appointee said "Racism is dead" when he knows better but won't admit it.
czarjak
Jan 2022
#35
the toe-nail i chopped off my LEFT big toe is smarter than Justice Robbbbberts
Trueblue1968
Jan 2022
#42
Thank you. Claiming Roberts said OSHA "doesn't count anymore" is misleading...
CaptainTruth
Jan 2022
#48