Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(34,845 posts)

1. Maybe because he knows they would lose their position?

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:57 AM

Oct 2012

If so, then Romney appears to be hiding information that would come out anyways and that means fewer ways to interpret whatever is in the testimony.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why would Romney's Lawyer have no position?? [View all] Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2012 OP

Maybe because he knows they would lose their position? randome Oct 2012 #1

Because they don't want to draw attention to it. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2012 #2

I don know Mass. law, but Dem2TheCore Oct 2012 #3

The Problem With This Problem... KharmaTrain Oct 2012 #6

But the details of the divorce probably won't even matter. randome Oct 2012 #8

I Keep Hoping These Things Matter... KharmaTrain Oct 2012 #13

Maybe .... wait for it .... GeorgeGist Oct 2012 #7

Because Stemberg's position is Willard's position. Bluenorthwest Oct 2012 #10

Because having no opinion best serves his client's interests cthulu2016 Oct 2012 #11

Doesn't want the appearance that there is something to hide, LisaL Oct 2012 #12

Because the reason for the sealing has nothing to do with Romney marshall Oct 2012 #14