Nothing but conjecture from you again. How many other accusers do you doubt without backing it up? Why not just use the R word? Too scared? I have a down syndrome sibling, so real classy emoji.
You appear to have a problem with facts. You do realize that everyone working for Ep/Max and many of their victims were/are (mostly) under NDA's that limit their ability to speak. Only now are some of those limits being removed, but it will take time to benefit justice.
You really seem to vigorously oppose justice for obvious abusers. I wish you had the same passion for reading and fact based dialogue.
Two other Maxwell victims testified against her, besides Virginia. You are calling them liars? Glad you were not on the jury, no need for a defense, you just choose to not believe. What Q has to do with this, I have no idea, but nice throw in for absolutely no reason. Just muddying the waters? They seemed murky for you already.
I will not post the entire history of this case, but you are in denial or blissful ignorance, one issue can be rectified and make the other impossible to carry on with. Try it.
Start with the Epstein plea deal, the NDA's, and the settlements that provide immunity to his, as you say, "innocent" associates that needed legal immunity for, as you say, a crime that "never happened."
As for killing Virginia, no need when you believe you are above the law. When you realize you are not, it is too late because it would be too obvious. Abusers do not believe they need to silence their victims, they think their abuse will silence them. The more I try to go through your victim blaming the more nauseous I get. I am done.
Do the your due diligence or do not, but do not bring your fact free opinions at me.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read