Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mr. Ected

(9,714 posts)
26. A principled jurist with an eye on the future. Nothing else is relevant.
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 07:29 PM
Jan 2022

No political affiliation, just jurisprudence in line with Democratic ideals.

For life.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

black woman never bigtree Jan 2022 #1
A black woman hasn't been nominated to the Supreme Court for almost... well, never. nt Xipe Totec Jan 2022 #2
Didn't Clinton Nominate RobinA Jan 2022 #61
Attorney General I think. tblue37 Jan 2022 #68
Better yet, a non-religious affiliated individual. FoxNewsSucks Jan 2022 #3
+1 chowder66 Jan 2022 #35
+1000 USALiberal Jan 2022 #45
An atheist would be great. lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #64
Yes, that is overdue. BSdetect Jan 2022 #70
Absolutely FoxNewsSucks Jan 2022 #74
I agree. kairos12 Jan 2022 #77
When was the last time an Athiest was nominated? Angleae Jan 2022 #4
Nope, we're at the mercy of people who believe in a magic sky dude for concise analytical thinking NightWatcher Jan 2022 #27
Atheists are the most under-represented Mr.Bill Jan 2022 #33
lol nt BootinUp Jan 2022 #46
We don't know. Most sensible people who don't believe Hortensis Jan 2022 #67
That RobinA Jan 2022 #72
Why is that important? Leith Jan 2022 #5
Ahem... Mossfern Jan 2022 #12
I stand corrected Leith Jan 2022 #16
Breyer and Kagan are Jewish too Polybius Jan 2022 #53
Abe Fortas, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan... Hekate Jan 2022 #21
Thank you. nt BlackSkimmer Jan 2022 #37
Brandeis, Cardozo, Frankfurter, Goldberg, Fortas, Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan... Hekate Jan 2022 #22
This one baffles ForgedCrank Jan 2022 #29
I Don't Think RobinA Jan 2022 #75
There have been a total of eight Jewish Justices of the Supreme Court. hedda_foil Jan 2022 #32
Do more research! Nt USALiberal Jan 2022 #47
protestant pamdb Jan 2022 #6
An atheist would be a boss selection if we have to use this as a litmus. nt Gore1FL Jan 2022 #7
Well..this is interesting Deuxcents Jan 2022 #8
Religious tests are banned by Article VI of the Constitution. lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #69
Ty.. Deuxcents Jan 2022 #71
Well past time for an atheist, and who is also a black woman. Queer would be a bonus. Celerity Jan 2022 #9
Sorry, but the "no religious test" clause of the Constituion means exactly that n/t markpkessinger Jan 2022 #10
no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust... lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #65
I want to see a LGBTQ on the court! William769 Jan 2022 #11
I'm a gay woman, and I couldn't care less about anyone's sexual orientation. nt BlackSkimmer Jan 2022 #38
You have my sympathy. nt William769 Jan 2022 #56
Just a reminder that Justice Sotomayor is Catholic n/t markpkessinger Jan 2022 #13
As are Zeitghost Jan 2022 #14
If only all the Catholics on the court was as brilliant and talented as Justice Sotomayor SharonClark Jan 2022 #15
Of 115 SCOTUS Justices sarisataka Jan 2022 #17
Well spotted. nt BlackSkimmer Jan 2022 #39
Separation of church and state dclarston13 Jan 2022 #18
And yet... Mr.Bill Jan 2022 #34
Yet Protestants have made up over 85% of ALL justices. Torchlight Jan 2022 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author RB TexLa Jan 2022 #54
Why not a Unitarian? tenderfoot Jan 2022 #20
Early on, I believe there was; and/or Deist Hekate Jan 2022 #25
Gorsuch confirmed as a Catholic. VGNonly Jan 2022 #23
There is a split in Episcopalianism that is VERY Captain Zero Jan 2022 #50
The particular church seems to be fairly welcoming, which was enough for the rabid RW to attack it muriel_volestrangler Jan 2022 #59
Why not just state no more Federalist Society picks? Hekate Jan 2022 #24
That would be best, FoxNewsSucks Jan 2022 #42
A principled jurist with an eye on the future. Nothing else is relevant. Mr. Ected Jan 2022 #26
Yes, the poor underrepresented Protestants of this country will have their day at last. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2022 #28
Affirmative actions for WASPS iemanja Jan 2022 #30
Athiest? No. Xolodno Jan 2022 #31
I have to admit. I've never paid attention to the religion of any of them. BlackSkimmer Jan 2022 #36
I'd rather have an atheist or Buddhist Bluesaph Jan 2022 #40
Gorsuch is a protestant fishwax Jan 2022 #41
Thank God! Goodheart Jan 2022 #43
An atheist of any sort, never. Voltaire2 Jan 2022 #44
I want someone who never references their own faith BootinUp Jan 2022 #48
How about: religion shouldn't be a factor at all? brooklynite Jan 2022 #49
This is a proxy debate over abortion NutmegYankee Jan 2022 #51
But no Biden nominee is going to be opposed to abortion rights... brooklynite Jan 2022 #52
Amazing how 32 year without a Protestant nominee is apparently more offensive than the 210 years RB TexLa Jan 2022 #55
Not sure where "210 years" has come from muriel_volestrangler Jan 2022 #60
Troll tenderfoot Jan 2022 #57
Yep RandiFan1290 Jan 2022 #58
I think it's time for Atheists to be appointed. Sick and Tired of Religious based decisions msfiddlestix Jan 2022 #62
"no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust" lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #63
No kidding. FoxNewsSucks Jan 2022 #73
I give no fucks about justices' religious views -- I only care about their take on the law. SYFROYH Jan 2022 #66
Fuck ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLL of THAT!!!!! CrackityJones75 Jan 2022 #76
And an atheist NEVER... Happy Hoosier Jan 2022 #78
Ridiculous n/t kcr Jan 2022 #79
As silly as I think this post is, I see no reason to delete it. I think all us calling LizBeth Jan 2022 #80
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's time. A Protestant h...»Reply #26