Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CrispyQ

(41,079 posts)
14. That's my question, too.
Sat Feb 12, 2022, 01:14 PM
Feb 2022

We have to prove Trump meant for Raffensperger to steal the election. Here are some selected quotes from the Trump/Raffensperger call.

Trump to Raffensperger: So look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state.

Trump to Germany: Look, we need only 11,000 votes. We have are far more than that as it stands now. We’ll have more and more.

Trump to Raffensperger: So what are we going to do here, folks? I only need 11,000 votes. Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me a break.

Trump to Mitchell: All we have to do, Cleta, is find 11,000-plus votes.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-transcript-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/2768e0cc-4ddd-11eb-83e3-322644d82356_story.html

Here’s the full transcript and audio of the call between Trump and Raffensperger

By Amy Gardner and Paulina Firozi
January 5, 2021


About 3 p.m. Saturday, President Trump held an hour-long call with Brad Raffensperger, Georgia’s secretary of state, in which he repeatedly urged him to alter the outcome of the presidential vote in the state. He was joined on the call by White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and several lawyers, including longtime conservative attorney Cleta Mitchell and Georgia-based attorney Kurt Hilbert. Raffensperger was joined by his office’s general counsel, Ryan Germany, and Deputy Secretary of State Jordan Fuchs.

~transcript at link, which doesn't seem to be behind a paywall



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yep. Follow the Sharpie dalton99a Feb 2022 #1
What Marty Byrde (Ozark) would do underpants Feb 2022 #2
Why is intent supposedly so difficult to prove? Lettuce Be Feb 2022 #3
Yup. It's up to the jury, and any juror with common sense would deduce the obvious intent. SunSeeker Feb 2022 #11
Were you lying or just wrong? Chellee Feb 2022 #13
"Mistakes were made." lastlib Feb 2022 #15
Well, yeah. Chellee Feb 2022 #18
Right! ymetca Feb 2022 #25
That's my question, too. CrispyQ Feb 2022 #14
The entire Nation has heard the evidence deelee Feb 2022 #20
Headline: Miguelito Loveless Feb 2022 #4
NO! It was all forged. DJT never done none of it! COL Mustard Feb 2022 #5
Like ananda Feb 2022 #6
Funny story, illustrative, years ago Captain Zero Feb 2022 #7
TFG's signature looks like a drawing of a KKK rally. OMGWTF Feb 2022 #8
I've noticed how it looks like a seismograph Fritz Walter Feb 2022 #17
I just looked it up and it does! pandr32 Feb 2022 #19
Good one. fightforfreedom Feb 2022 #24
Sharp observation! And so apropos. Dark n Stormy Knight Feb 2022 #28
Back in the day, the lawyers said never write on a copy of a document Klaralven Feb 2022 #9
TFG had his very own autographed model.... SergeStorms Feb 2022 #10
Rich people always get stuff for free. Dark n Stormy Knight Feb 2022 #29
Yeah, the unwritten law. SergeStorms Feb 2022 #30
Meanwhile, FailedCoupGuy is busy flushing KS Toronado Feb 2022 #12
WHATEVER works. calimary Feb 2022 #16
Sharpie trumps dullard. Qutzupalotl Feb 2022 #21
I don't care who takes him down CanonRay Feb 2022 #22
I expect in five more years we will move on to the next stage of the prosecution LiberalLovinLug Feb 2022 #23
With the ginned up threat of violence from the loyal mob ymetca Feb 2022 #26
Agree, unfortunately. 🤬 Duppers Feb 2022 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trumps infamous Sharpie s...»Reply #14