Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

localroger

(3,782 posts)
18. My interpretation of what this means
Mon Feb 14, 2022, 07:12 PM
Feb 2022

Normally an accountant trusts their client to give them valid materials to work with, and their fig leaf is that "our client gave us this." What I think is happening here is that so much has come out so quickly revealing that the source materials are crap that Mazars has decided to cover its ass and admit that, on review, it is not possible that all of the materials they were given to work with are trustworthy, and so all the documents we prepared with them are suspect. This is probably the basis for them to revoke their professional endorsement of those documents, which now leaves Donnie and fam in the lurch to provide those documents required by law that are properly certified.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's Accounting Firm R...»Reply #18