Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jedi Guy

(3,448 posts)
22. Not sure what you mean by, "yet this is what is done."
Mon Feb 14, 2022, 09:57 PM
Feb 2022

This is the consequence of a law that was created because of the nationwide backlog of rape kits. It was created specifically to ensure that information garnered via those kits was processed and entered in a timely fashion. All the data goes into a database so if a match is found later, it'll result in a hit.

That's all that happened here. This wasn't and isn't some sort of conspiracy against this woman in particular or women in general on the part of law enforcement or the state of California. The law is written in such a way that it doesn't specify that only the rapist's DNA goes in. So the lab dutifully entered the data, and then this woman's DNA was gathered from the scene of a different crime, processed, and resulted in a hit.

In just about any major police department, property crimes and sex crimes are handled by different units staffed by different officers. So the officers dealing with the property crime case had absolutely no way of knowing that they'd get a hit on DNA from a rape kit.

This is an example of the law of unintended consequences rather than evidence of malice on the part of any of the actors involved.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This seems abusive of the technology????🤔 Deuce Feb 2022 #1
The cruelty is breathtaking. K&R. WhiskeyGrinder Feb 2022 #2
I want to know if it was *all* rape victims, or if they selected whose DNA to enter. Nevilledog Feb 2022 #4
Either way it's shit and I can't see how it's not a violation of rights. WhiskeyGrinder Feb 2022 #8
I agree with you. Nevilledog Feb 2022 #9
Why would they think that was a good idea? treestar Feb 2022 #3
Just another way to keep women mercuryblues Feb 2022 #5
That was my immediate thought Bettie Feb 2022 #7
Yep nt berniesandersmittens Feb 2022 #15
Yep MustLoveBeagles Feb 2022 #20
K&R Solly Mack Feb 2022 #6
We need names Sympthsical Feb 2022 #10
Jesus obamanut2012 Feb 2022 #11
California state law requires that DNA from rape kits be entered into the system. Jedi Guy Feb 2022 #12
Not the victims DNA. boston bean Feb 2022 #13
I'm not sure that's true, based on the text of the law. Jedi Guy Feb 2022 #14
CA needs to clarify that only DNA from the RAPIST can be entered, not the victim. Liberty Belle Feb 2022 #17
No disagreement here. Jedi Guy Feb 2022 #21
Since it hasn't been mentioned yet, I'm going to address the elephant Karma13612 Feb 2022 #16
That was my thought as well. Hell, we have a nationwide backlog of untested rape kits niyad Feb 2022 #18
Not sure what you mean by, "yet this is what is done." Jedi Guy Feb 2022 #22
Thank you for the clarification. niyad Feb 2022 #24
I was wondering that, too Leith Feb 2022 #19
Whoever authorized this needs to be fired right now. Stinky The Clown Feb 2022 #23
They enter everyone's DNA in a database. Doesn't matter how they collect it. Jacson6 Feb 2022 #25
Hmmm. You understand why putting a rape victim's ... Whiskeytide Feb 2022 #26
Because we live in a misogynist society while every pretends otherwise and explains to us LizBeth Feb 2022 #27
that is fucked up beyond belief Kali Feb 2022 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WTF?! San Francisco polic...»Reply #22