Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Stinky The Clown

(68,941 posts)

29. You're correct. He is not entitled to an opinion and I should never have posted about it.

Reply to SoonerPride (Reply #27)

Thu Feb 17, 2022, 03:31 PM

Feb 2022

You DO understand that was SARCHASM. Not sarcasm. SARCHASM. Different word. It often but not always applies to those who dwell in the ozone.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I saw my eye doc on Tuesday. He made a credible case for Fauci to be replaced . . . . [View all] Stinky The Clown Feb 2022 OP

hell no. no giving in to the bastards. (nt) NoRethugFriends Feb 2022 #1

If they change him as a spokesman Casady1 Feb 2022 #2

I understand,,, KarenS Feb 2022 #3

No and no. Demsrule86 Feb 2022 #4

Your eye doctor??? Is he some type of expert on viruses? USALiberal Feb 2022 #5

Are you? Stinky The Clown Feb 2022 #24

He was only opining on being the spokesman/public face, not on Fauci's undoubted expertise Hekate Feb 2022 #33

They'll just try to destroy the person who replaces him. LuckyCharms Feb 2022 #6

Yep. n/t demmiblue Feb 2022 #10

yes. if you're one of those stopdiggin Feb 2022 #14

It's a 'shoot the messenger' thing for... Septua Feb 2022 #21

Your doctor sounds like a right winger. Demsrule86 Feb 2022 #7

Yes, he is clueless. Irish_Dem Feb 2022 #16

Republicans will do this demonizing to anybody who is even remotely on our side. Walleye Feb 2022 #8

That used to be how we operate many years ago. Claustrum Feb 2022 #9

dont give in to the bastards Blues Heron Feb 2022 #11

Thanks for the snark. Got a rec for a new eye doc? Stinky The Clown Feb 2022 #25

Sorry Stinky. you're right Blues Heron Feb 2022 #26

Who would the new "public face" be? AngryOldDem Feb 2022 #12

I am tempted to say Do not give in but his PH work is SO important and I think it is worth considera riversedge Feb 2022 #13

My only concern about Fauci is his age. He has worked tirelessly on covid-19 panader0 Feb 2022 #15

I would have a hard time JustAnotherGen Feb 2022 #17

Well, I remember the days when the US Surgeon General had a LOT Karma13612 Feb 2022 #18

I agree with the eye doctor who never claimed to be a virologist btw. Beakybird Feb 2022 #19

Nope. Make the MAGAts and mouth breathers cringe when they see him! 634-5789 Feb 2022 #20

I think its about the message. Omen78 Feb 2022 #22

I'll take Fauci as spokesman over Willinski (sp ?) any day of the week. CentralMass Feb 2022 #23

I think your eye doctor should stick to opthamology SoonerPride Feb 2022 #27

You're correct. He is not entitled to an opinion and I should never have posted about it. Stinky The Clown Feb 2022 #29

You asked my thoughts. SoonerPride Feb 2022 #30

He never asked to be in charge. I didn't suggest he should be. Stinky The Clown Feb 2022 #31

You seems personally offended that someone has a differing opinion SoonerPride Feb 2022 #32

Actually, it seems that perhaps you have an issue with comprehension. Stinky The Clown Feb 2022 #38

This message was self-deleted by its author traitorsgalore Feb 2022 #28

There's nothing bad about the idea Poiuyt Feb 2022 #34

This message was self-deleted by its author Emile Feb 2022 #35

As long as they don't make Rand Paul the media spokesman! Emile Feb 2022 #36

I Disagree With Your Doctor ProfessorGAC Feb 2022 #37

Fauci is one of the best things going in government cadoman Feb 2022 #39