Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
25. Thank you, NewHendoLib, for your OP. This is very good. More excerpts....
Sun Feb 20, 2022, 02:10 PM
Feb 2022

Brooks is well-intentioned and observant; he’s never been our enemy. Disagreement on some points is not a sin.

ETA: At his best — and this is one of those times — Brooks shows how deeply grounded he is in the study of History. In this context, democracy has a small d, and liberal has a small l — the way the founders used the terms.

Especially cogent is his explanation of “normal” — and it really is not pretty. The planet is reverting.

Just as America’s founders understood that democracy is not natural, the postwar generation understood that peace is not natural — it has to be tended and cultivated from the frailties of human passion and greed.
…….

Over the past few generations, that hopeful but sober view of human nature has faded. What has been called the Culture of Narcissism took hold, with the view that human beings should be unshackled from restraint. You can trust yourself to be unselfish! Democracy and world peace were taken for granted.

What happens when you don’t tend the seedbeds of democracy? Chaos? War? No, you return to normal. The 15th, 16th, 17th and 18th centuries were normal. Big countries such as China, Russia and Turkey are ruled by fierce leaders with massive power. That’s normal. Small aristocracies in many nations hog gigantic shares of their nations’ wealth. That’s normal. Many people come to despise cultural outsiders, such as immigrants. Normal. Global affairs resembles the law of the jungle, with big countries threatening small ones. This is the way it has been for most of human history.
In normal times, people crave order and leaders such as Vladimir Putin arise to give it to them. Mr. Putin and Xi Jinping have arisen to be the 21st century’s paradigmatic men.
Mr. Putin, Mr. Xi and the other global conservatives make comprehensive critiques of liberalism and the failings of liberal society. Unlike past authoritarians, they have the massive power of modern surveillance technology to control their citizens.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Brooks is a good writer and a palatable Never Trump conservative. Tommy Carcetti Feb 2022 #1
he is clearly on a path towards "us" - this is his most left wing column I've ever read NewHendoLib Feb 2022 #2
Brooks has always been a knee jerk supporter of the Republican Party no matter what. He's a polite Martin68 Feb 2022 #5
+1000000000000000000 HUAJIAO Feb 2022 #9
+1 (Nt) FreepFryer Feb 2022 #19
I don't thinks Brooks is an intellectual at all. He is intelligent, yes, but he just takes positions HUAJIAO Feb 2022 #10
Brooks is a horrible hack - the print version of Chuck Todd. Nt Fiendish Thingy Feb 2022 #11
While I used to laugh at Brooks on the old McNeil/Lehrer News Hour, HUAJIAO Feb 2022 #3
I remember Mark Shields pretty regularly destroying his stances NewHendoLib Feb 2022 #4
Yes, and Mark tried so hard not to make him look like a jerk... HUAJIAO Feb 2022 #7
He's intelligent and can be sensitive but but he's reflexively rightwing struggle4progress Feb 2022 #6
I think there is something about his sensitivity that is out of balance. HUAJIAO Feb 2022 #8
Excellent observation. Without a "straight man," Brooks unknowingly veers way off base (Nt) FreepFryer Feb 2022 #18
A descent into ad hominem attacks on David Brooks? summer_in_TX Feb 2022 #12
yes, it is a shame. very brilliant article. thanks for your comment. NewHendoLib Feb 2022 #13
It points to what has lead to the current unraveling of democracy. summer_in_TX Feb 2022 #14
Yes. I read the entire article to my wife . NewHendoLib Feb 2022 #15
Whole editorial can be read at moonscape Feb 2022 #16
Many thanks Hekate Feb 2022 #23
I've heard him say the opposite so many times I don't believe anything he says anymore. Martin68 Feb 2022 #20
Yah Johonny Feb 2022 #21
Big time. DU fanboying on Brooks while he argues about liberalism's "failure." (Nt) FreepFryer Feb 2022 #32
I am also disappointed in those reactions. Brooks is thoughtful; I hope to read the whole thing Hekate Feb 2022 #22
Completely agree sammythecat Feb 2022 #24
Brooks can't help but condemn Liberalism, especially when he is decrying it's "failings" FreepFryer Feb 2022 #17
Did you actually read the entire article? NewHendoLib Feb 2022 #26
Same old same old. Start from an erroneous premise that liberalism fails, win a cash prize. FreepFryer Feb 2022 #27
So you didn't. Thx. NewHendoLib Feb 2022 #28
... about a phenomenon he himself promulgated. Thx. (Nt) FreepFryer Feb 2022 #31
Small "l" small "d" liberal democracy in a small "r" republic was what the founders aimed for... Hekate Feb 2022 #30
Thank you, NewHendoLib, for your OP. This is very good. More excerpts.... Hekate Feb 2022 #25
"What weakness in liberalism are its enemies exploiting?" gulliver Feb 2022 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Brooks writes a rea...»Reply #25