Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(22,716 posts)
34. Have you seen the aftermath of such weapons?
Sat Feb 26, 2022, 01:30 PM
Feb 2022

I have, in person. It's not unusual for there to be "collateral damage"

Also Ukraine is still very much in the battle. It would make far more sense to use the artillery shell for its intended purpose.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How you going to get them to the Ukrainians? vlyons Feb 2022 #1
Smuggle them across the border. fightforfreedom Feb 2022 #2
Lol, I'm sure that they have their best people working on it! USALiberal Feb 2022 #3
This about it. fightforfreedom Feb 2022 #5
Yeah, might as well have some FUN with this war! Paladin Feb 2022 #19
I'd Buy That For a Dollar! harumph Feb 2022 #24
All of our European Allies are signatories Voltaire2 Feb 2022 #4
Yep. Unattended mines hurt a lot of civilians and especially children. TheBlackAdder Feb 2022 #28
Sorry to disappoint, but the war crimes are being committed by Russia, not Ukraine FSogol Feb 2022 #6
Don't you remember Iraq? fightforfreedom Feb 2022 #8
So we should act like terrorists? FSogol Feb 2022 #21
They should do that's effective BGBD Feb 2022 #36
War crimes? fightforfreedom Feb 2022 #9
And you would avoid innocent Ukrainian casualties, how? hlthe2b Feb 2022 #7
Do the Russians play by any rules? Throck Feb 2022 #10
So you don't care about Ukrainian civilian casualties? hlthe2b Feb 2022 #11
I think the Russians have it covered. Throck Feb 2022 #13
Waging aggressive war is also a crime. Chainfire Feb 2022 #17
What a response,,. "IEDs only effectively take out the enemy." Did you learn NOTHING from Iraq hlthe2b Feb 2022 #18
Dude, you don't know what you're talking about. harumph Feb 2022 #26
Directed does NOT imply without collateral civilian deaths. On THAT, "DUDE", hlthe2b Feb 2022 #31
Have you seen the aftermath of such weapons? sarisataka Feb 2022 #34
You're fucking kidding right? harumph Feb 2022 #25
I don't "kid" about innocent civilian deaths. If that is funny to YOU, you have no hlthe2b Feb 2022 #32
Molotov Cocktails Dirty Socialist Feb 2022 #12
They don't call roadside bombs "Improvised" explosive devices (IED) for nothing. Chainfire Feb 2022 #14
You get what I am saying. fightforfreedom Feb 2022 #15
RPG's would be more effective. honest.abe Feb 2022 #16
Germany just agreed to shipping some Dirty Socialist Feb 2022 #33
In WWII burrowowl Feb 2022 #20
As a now banned member once wrote, "The technique is called "zealotry trolling" FSogol Feb 2022 #22
That is absurd. harumph Feb 2022 #27
The OP was advocating the US supply "road side" (sic) bombs. FSogol Feb 2022 #29
I said nothing about the US supplying them. It could come from us, from any NATO country. fightforfreedom Feb 2022 #30
They need more sophisticated weapons than that. AngryOldDem Feb 2022 #23
Anyone with some knowledge sarisataka Feb 2022 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How about supplying road ...»Reply #34