Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gab13by13

(32,803 posts)
10. What case, what cases?
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 12:42 PM
Mar 2022

Steve Bannon has no case, his trial is set for the end of July. Bannon had no dealings with Trump or the White House.

Here is all that DOJ has to do. Do what the select committee just did. John Eastman claims lawyer client privilege or executive privilege, or whatever other privilege to keep from testifying. The select committee laid it all out with documentation why those privilege's don't apply. You can't invoke privileges if your activities were criminal.

DOJ can do the same thing with Meadows, were it to chose to prosecute.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Even if your last line were true, FoxNewsSucks Mar 2022 #1
Disclaimer; gab13by13 Mar 2022 #3
I'm coming to the conclusion the 'No one is above the law' is an American Fairy Tale. spanone Mar 2022 #2
THAT IS 💯 onecaliberal Mar 2022 #8
A Fractured Fairy Tale. TheBlackAdder Mar 2022 #21
Bwahahahahaaa.... spanone Mar 2022 #23
I've heard it said... Cracklin Charlie Mar 2022 #4
What case, what cases? gab13by13 Mar 2022 #10
Remember when Romney voted in Massachusetts gab13by13 Mar 2022 #5
He won't be nt doc03 Mar 2022 #6
Right there with you doc. blueinredohio Mar 2022 #12
I have come to the conclusion the Jan 6th committee doc03 Mar 2022 #18
Never SoCalDavidS Mar 2022 #7
Any second now. Hold your breath while you wait for it. ;) Chainfire Mar 2022 #9
Doctor tells me not to, gab13by13 Mar 2022 #11
So, are you going to listen to a doctor or a plumber on a medical issue? Chainfire Mar 2022 #20
Garland is on it. Sneederbunk Mar 2022 #13
Unless they find he voted in two places, probably never on that charge. Hoyt Mar 2022 #14
Good to know, gab13by13 Mar 2022 #15
Are you aware of a little thing called "discovery"? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #16
So what if DOJ has to show all evidence? gab13by13 Mar 2022 #19
So you'd rather see Meadows get indicted for a small offence, and the others get off? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #22
Today would be good.... lastlib Mar 2022 #17
Two months ago, there wasn't a tenth of the significant physical evidence and testimony as now Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #24
When there is a warrant issued for his arrest, after he is indicted. MineralMan Mar 2022 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So when will Mark Meadows...»Reply #10