Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cheezoholic

(3,790 posts)
53. Just my opinion but I believe its smoke and mirrors here
Wed Mar 9, 2022, 12:04 AM
Mar 2022

I mean what Mr. Lieu said. How in the hell did the west get all those munitions into Ukraine in the last week?

I watch a lot of these ADS-B "radar" sites because I'm an av-geek. Nearly every day theres a couple NATO Blackhawks, C-130's, Ospreys etc that get within 10 miles of the Ukrainian border and go transponders off dark only to pop back up an hour or two later. ADS-B needs to be taken with a grain of salt because if we can see it on a website surely the Russians see it. There were no less than 5 NATO electronic warfare planes hugging the entire Ukranian border yesterday, surely slamming, jamming and searching for Russian forces land and air. Once again a grain of salt. Are some of these diversionary tactics? Hide and seek? The Russians have begun flying their own version of AWACS out of SW Belarus. Someone else on DU mentioned they saw KC135 tankers flying refuling missions but for what they didnt know. Well we just "found out" a few days ago that the Harry S. Truman carrier battle group was positioned in the North Aegean Sea and were flying sorties along the SW border of Ukraine. Plenty of tanker activity there with nothing else showing up. Been a few B52 passes along the border then they shut off their public transponders, not a common aircraft over Europe.

My point is this stuff is what anyone can see. Whose to say this whole Mig thing is what anyone can see but the real shits going on we cant see. Once again, letting Russia know what NATO "can" do and keeping them guessing what NATO "is" doing. I'd almost bet those MIG's and maybe more are already in country. While most of the C-17 and AN-400 supply flights are going into Rzeszów where does that stuff go from there? Could be anywhere along the border. Could be Polish farmers loading shit up on their tractors at night and crossing giving them to Ukrainian farmers on their tractors. How much of these armaments are going through Moldova? We just don't know. And if the Pentagon is playing the media and us to hide whats really going on that's their job, be it for a righteous conflict such as this or for not so righteous conflicts we've been involved with in the past. Deception and secrecy to convolute and confuse the enemy is their job. And members of congress are great tools to use in that deception.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

W.T.F. mainer Mar 2022 #1
As am I.. Deuxcents Mar 2022 #4
Here we go again. Gonna hear how weak Dems are. Lunch Putin in the face while we can. Pepsidog Mar 2022 #56
I'm with Ted. Always. dchill Mar 2022 #2
One of our best. femmedem Mar 2022 #5
I agree with you, too. dchill Mar 2022 #6
: onecaliberal Mar 2022 #3
K&R! n/t AntiFascist Mar 2022 #7
Come on..let's get this done PortTack Mar 2022 #8
Who at the Pentagon made this decision? Budi Mar 2022 #9
Someone in the pocket of Russian oligarch? n/t AntiFascist Mar 2022 #10
Flynn's brother I bet uponit7771 Mar 2022 #13
Flynn's brother maybe? nt woodsprite Mar 2022 #51
The White House former9thward Mar 2022 #22
Sounds as tho the Pentagon had a major decision in this move. Budi Mar 2022 #32
why the US? Takket Mar 2022 #11
Too much risk IronLionZion Mar 2022 #29
Is this what's holding up the show? KS Toronado Mar 2022 #49
Joe, pick up the phone, order them to do it and do it NOW Eliot Rosewater Mar 2022 #12
+1, uponit7771 Mar 2022 #14
I think he will jcgoldie Mar 2022 #16
Poland stepped-up, but they want U.S. skin in the game. Pentagon says nyet! nt Cognitive_Resonance Mar 2022 #15
"Pentagon says "nyet". " Means what exactly?.... Budi Mar 2022 #36
Looks like Poland called a bluff. DoD wasn't onboard. Unclear what's really going on. nt Cognitive_Resonance Mar 2022 #45
when I was in the service , D.O.D.-- dept .of dumbells !! monkeyman1 Mar 2022 #54
I want to hear what Lieu's and Kinzinger's "substantive rationale" is gulliver Mar 2022 #17
It could be that both Biden, Pentagon are playing this for their one man audience. ancianita Mar 2022 #18
I have to agree with this gay texan Mar 2022 #24
The very strength of our strategy is that we play as if we don't strategize. ancianita Mar 2022 #35
I tend to agree... kentuck Mar 2022 #50
what's going on, Pentagon doesn't want to share jets with Poland? AlexSFCA Mar 2022 #19
I agree 100% with Ted and Adam. Stop giving in to Putin. sinkingfeeling Mar 2022 #20
You know Putin has nukes, right? Beaverhausen Mar 2022 #21
You know we got nukes, right? It's who strikes fastest and first. HE better not give US an excuse. ancianita Mar 2022 #37
At this point I wonder if Putin's nukes might blow up in his face like the war so far. Pepsidog Mar 2022 #57
They have more missiles.... SergeStorms Mar 2022 #58
More isn't faster. We have more anti-missile power. His are circled around Moscow. ancianita Mar 2022 #60
My understanding of this is that Poland is sending the MIGs and we will PatrickforB Mar 2022 #23
The real problem here is: James48 Mar 2022 #25
Yeah. Well you might be explaining their thinking, but seriously, ancianita Mar 2022 #38
Pretending we are not at war is the only thing preventing us from actually being at war. LudwigPastorius Mar 2022 #42
I hear you. Point taken. But now Putin's daring the world to stop his war. ancianita Mar 2022 #43
"as Ukraine goes, so the EU goes." LudwigPastorius Mar 2022 #46
Like I said. ancianita Mar 2022 #52
Just do it. Joinfortmill Mar 2022 #26
This could be a little dicey...... Hulk Mar 2022 #27
Can't we put them on Trucks? nt Gore1FL Mar 2022 #28
Russia will hit them with air strikes while on the ground IronLionZion Mar 2022 #31
Loose Lips Sink Ships DallasNE Mar 2022 #30
Yup. A misstep in communication, & the situation cannot afford that right now. Budi Mar 2022 #34
Tomorrow, Jen P should say: " Shit. A bunch of Ukrainian ... Whiskeytide Mar 2022 #33
It's not impossible to think boyedav1969 Mar 2022 #39
It's called "plausible deniability" and it is to prevent the escalation into nuclear war. LudwigPastorius Mar 2022 #40
The solution is: kentuck Mar 2022 #41
Well that means that we'd have a NATO-Russia war. Would China stand by? Maybe. ancianita Mar 2022 #44
The US can't just "immediately bring Ukraine into NATO". Mariana Mar 2022 #64
Why the fuck are operational national security matters being spouted all over fucking twitter??? Shanti Shanti Shanti Mar 2022 #47
IMHO, if they are playing this out in public, there is most likely another scenario going on vsrazdem Mar 2022 #48
I heard someone say today that drones would better serve radical noodle Mar 2022 #59
Just my opinion but I believe its smoke and mirrors here Cheezoholic Mar 2022 #53
K & R. Thank You. Yours is the only sensible answer there is. Budi Mar 2022 #62
Consult fast DFW Mar 2022 #55
My guess liberal_patriot_md Mar 2022 #61
Maybe the Pentagon is using the media to hide what they're really doing from the Republicans. halfulglas Mar 2022 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ted Lieu and Adam Kinzing...»Reply #53