General Discussion

Justice matters.

(9,810 posts)

72. In 3 years and 10 months, the statute of limitations will be expired.

Reply to pandr32 (Reply #60)

Thu Mar 10, 2022, 12:12 PM

Mar 2022

Just like the Obstruction of Justice cases in Mueller's report Tome II expired this year.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

95 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Garland says the Jan. 6 investigation won't end until everyone is held to account [View all] Joinfortmill Mar 2022 OP

...K&R... spanone Mar 2022 #1

Justice (grossly) delayed is justice denied & this is beginning to feel like an interminable delay hlthe2b Mar 2022 #2

I mean sure.... CrackityJones75 Mar 2022 #11

i ignore nothing that he said. I only state the facts before us. I hope he "gets around to it" but.. hlthe2b Mar 2022 #12

Where did you come up with that? CrackityJones75 Mar 2022 #14

Where did I get it? Really? hlthe2b Mar 2022 #16

It's always better to answer someone's question with grace and patience and save MLAA Mar 2022 #23

I agree. hlthe2b Mar 2022 #24

That was actually very informative. ShazzieB Mar 2022 #32

And yet, the term "delayed" is entirely subjective... Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #61

When his former law professor (Tribe) and other former DOJ officials express alarm re: his reticence hlthe2b Mar 2022 #65

Tribe was ONE of his law professors. MineralMan Mar 2022 #68

Where did I say the "ONLY" law professor? Why would you even think that? hlthe2b Mar 2022 #83

I do pay attention to Tribe on constitutional matters, however Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #69

The many former DOJ officials certainly HAVE--like Glenn Kirschner, Barb McQuade, hlthe2b Mar 2022 #84

No they haven't. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #86

Exactly my comment. Qualified concerns. Same as with Tribe. Don't restate my comment to hlthe2b Mar 2022 #87

You invoked Tribe, McQuade, Kirchner et al to support your claim of grossly delayed Justice Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #89

Delayed is the case. I'm done with your attempt to create some extreme argument with me when hlthe2b Mar 2022 #90

No. Nothing you just posted is in conflict with what I STATED. hlthe2b Mar 2022 #88

nt Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #94

He said enough to make it clear no one higher up will be held to account before 2022 elections Silent3 Mar 2022 #17

He did? CrackityJones75 Mar 2022 #19

It's March. Elections are in less than seven months and we're no higher than Proud Boys... Silent3 Mar 2022 #20

Likely not much before Nov 2022, but the OathKeepers level is just below Stone Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2022 #31

The indictments for seditious conspiracy are 1 degree of separation from Trump Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #67

This is gaslighting, SOL has already ran or about to run out on a couple cases (link) uponit7771 Mar 2022 #37

Yep not fooled Mar 2022 #74

These SOL's are totally unrelated to the January 6 crimes Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #76

+1, then the should peruse the 4 that do. I don't think enough people understand the attack the uponit7771 Mar 2022 #93

It's beyond an annoyance. FoxNewsSucks Mar 2022 #43

Watch out, gab13by13 Mar 2022 #58

This 10,000 % n/t msfiddlestix Mar 2022 #26

The Jan 6 investigation is already the largest the FBI ever mounted. Far from over. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2022 #28

No one said it was. Not one person on this thread. hlthe2b Mar 2022 #30

Fine. When you wrote "interminable" and "justice denied" that was redolent of "over" so I replied.nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2022 #33

You apparently did not see the word "DELAY" that followed that term in every single context? hlthe2b Mar 2022 #34

I never said you said the exact word "over", so relax. Have you looked up "redolent" yet? Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2022 #38

I don't appreciate those who reframe my comment with words I never used to make it sound the hlthe2b Mar 2022 #42

Okay, I'm sorry if it came off as "reframe". Was not my intention at all Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2022 #46

Thank you. I appreciate that. hlthe2b Mar 2022 #47

Is it really delayed? Ohio Joe Mar 2022 #54

The preeminent Laurence Tribe (Garland's former Prof at Harvard & someone who has had contact hlthe2b Mar 2022 #57

That is talking about a special prosecutor... Ohio Joe Mar 2022 #59

That is his most recent opinion piece. His twitter feed (which I do not have the ability to search hlthe2b Mar 2022 #63

I don't have twitter so I can't really search his twitter... Ohio Joe Mar 2022 #91

Yes. Tribe is intensely respectful of Garland and is measured in his criticisms as I would expect hlthe2b Mar 2022 #92

My gut feeling is the DOJ is not actively investigating him yet KS Toronado Mar 2022 #71

It took Robert Mueller 12 weeks to do the following; gab13by13 Mar 2022 #62

That is not true... Ohio Joe Mar 2022 #78

Thanks for your fact checking Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #80

12 weeks? Try minimum 9 months, for less complicated crimes to prosecute than seditious conspiracy Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #79

Sure hope it happens before 2024 Beachnutt Mar 2022 #3

Something big should have been done before the 2022 midterms... Silent3 Mar 2022 #15

"power to make Democratic victory in 2024 impossible" FoxNewsSucks Mar 2022 #39

It sounds good. kentuck Mar 2022 #4

Thank you Mr Garland- some of us knew you'd lock them up malaise Mar 2022 #5

I think Mr. Garland should reconsider this statement. gab13by13 Mar 2022 #6

the point being reasonably clear stopdiggin Mar 2022 #10

So the DOJ which is supposed to be non-partisan CrackityJones75 Mar 2022 #13

I do not back a political party gab13by13 Mar 2022 #25

+1, what's scary is FAUX News and GZP use same bullshit propaganda as Russia's TASS and Pravda uponit7771 Mar 2022 #41

Oh really? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #81

RIGHT !! not admitting the fact that it ***IS*** partisan doesn't help uponit7771 Mar 2022 #40

... LexVegas Mar 2022 #7

Awwwww, that's nice. dixiechiken1 Mar 2022 #8

In order to expedite, if that's even possible, I would imagine more attorneys would need to be hired Mr. Ected Mar 2022 #9

Color me skeptical Miguelito Loveless Mar 2022 #18

WTF was that nonsense ? kacekwl Mar 2022 #21

Not buying it. Goodheart Mar 2022 #22

actions (or lack thereof) speak louder than words. 14 months and counting Evolve Dammit Mar 2022 #27

Lordy, so many folks not reading what Garland said...thinking on it...but ofc Outrage First, maybe Alexander Of Assyria Mar 2022 #29

Amen to all of this! ShazzieB Mar 2022 #36

Unless the repubs steal the votes and majority in the election. :( woodsprite Mar 2022 #35

Garland doesn't speak on the timing issue? Why? Cause he doesn't want to be partisan ?! COME ON uponit7771 Mar 2022 #44

I have a question Rebl2 Mar 2022 #45

No but they can setup special counsel that will step over the DOJ investigations uponit7771 Mar 2022 #48

Hope my grandchildren live to see it. (nt) Paladin Mar 2022 #49

It must be shocking to many Republicans.... kentuck Mar 2022 #50

It's. A. Political. Decision. If. We. Don't. Prosecute. Nevilledog Mar 2022 #51

At this pace, the 10 Obstruction of Justice allegations have already expired... Justice matters. Mar 2022 #52

Wow iemanja Mar 2022 #53

Quite a Justice system... Justice matters. Mar 2022 #56

For Jan 6, as well? iemanja Mar 2022 #64

Mueller Report Tome II Justice matters. Mar 2022 #66

Which has nothing to do with January 6 Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #82

The post u replied to wasn't meant to be serious, just stirring the pot. Pot is empty. Lol Alexander Of Assyria Mar 2022 #95

For Garland's comment to be accurate, it assumes WE HOLD, the WH, HR, and take the Senate. usaf-vet Mar 2022 #55

Amen to that. usonian Mar 2022 #70

AG Garland is building up from the foundation pandr32 Mar 2022 #60

In 3 years and 10 months, the statute of limitations will be expired. Justice matters. Mar 2022 #72

A whole lot of room in almost 4 years. pandr32 Mar 2022 #85

Sounds good. jalan48 Mar 2022 #73

So not over until TFG faces justice! Emile Mar 2022 #75

Garland is doing his due diligence on this. MineralMan Mar 2022 #77