Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
8. That's back to where he was on Sep 17
Sat Oct 27, 2012, 07:39 PM
Oct 2012

which was after the conventions, during the 47% and a couple of weeks before the first debate.

The public (and media) generally over-react. They over-reacted to the empty chair and the brazen 47% tape and all the other mistakes Romney made during that period. Some of that bounce was hard core Republicans just getting exasperated with Romney. They were never going to vote for Obama. They were just having a frustrating month.

What we are looking at now is closer to the real number. Obama still has some upside as the rest of the polls show entirely post-debate results. In the next day or two most of the media will give up on that "Mittmentum" garbage narrative and start telling it straighter. That will also give Obama a little bit of upside as the polling wraps up this week.

Does anybody know if Silver's model tries to factor in the early voting information?

It is interesting that Silver has the odds of winning OH at 76% and WI at 86%. Yet, it does appear that Romney is turning to WI as his last chance. If that is happening, it is because the Romney campaign calculates that:

a) less early voting is done in WI, so there is better chance of overtaking Obama; and

b) there have been fewer ads overall in WI, so WI voters might be more impressionable then OH voters at this stage.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»nate s. 538 updated ---- ...»Reply #8