Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A possible return to atomic power??? WTH??? 🤬 🤬 🤬 [View all]Kid Berwyn
(24,701 posts)86. Karen Silkwood was murdered trying to tell the truth about nuclear power.

Remembering the Killing of Karen Silkwood
August 11, 2009 in Capitalism, Environmental Justice, Nuclear, Organizing
After watching the brilliantly-acted and courageous film Silkwood (1983, starring Meryl Streep), I learned the compelling story of Karen Silkwood and her death, which has seemingly been forgotten by America. Karen, only 28, was a union activist working in a Kerr-McGee nuclear power plant in Oklahoma, who died in a suspicious car accident while on her way to meet with a New York Times reporter for a story that would have exposed the companys dangerous and illegal mishandling of plutonium.
Karen was active in her union, calling attention to the radioactive contamination in the plant, and spent months compiling evidence to show that the company was deliberately covering up the fact that their fuel rods contained imperfections, which could put millions of lives at risk if they sparked a meltdown. The night of her death, many believe Karen was deliberately driven off the road by another car, and her family was later able to sue Kerr-McGee for $1.3 million in damages, but the company admits no wrongdoing.
The nuclear plant where Karen worked was shut down in 1975, one year after her death. When Karens story became public controversy, it helped display the dangers inherent to nuclear power, contributing to the amazingly successful anti-nuclear movement that has stopped construction of all new nuclear plants in the US since 1979. Thus is especially important today as some corporate lobbyists are trying to repackage nuclear power as a clean or carbon-free energy source. In fact, its none of those things.
Karens story is both a warning and an inspiration that capitalism pushes companies to sometimes do terrible things to protect their profits, even if it means endangering lives, but also that brave people such as Karen Silkwood, in bringing the truth to light, can challenge us to create a better world.
CONTINUED w LINKS:
http://endofcapitalism.com/2009/08/11/remembering-the-killing-of-karen-silkwood
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It was pretty much to the point about what he thought of the other's
MarineCombatEngineer
Mar 2022
#82
Well hopefully the plant discussed in the OP isn't going to build using 1970s tech.
Cuthbert Allgood
Mar 2022
#96
Nuclear power will never be safe...not from accidents, attacks etc. We can do better. And while
Demsrule86
Mar 2022
#77
The article stated "the company's small-scale nuclear generating technology",
multigraincracker
Mar 2022
#24
Its hardly a carbon free power source when the fuel must be mined and processed
Blues Heron
Mar 2022
#4
It's net positive over the years while FF is not, Nuke power is way beyond 3 Mile Island or Fukashim
uponit7771
Mar 2022
#14
Wind and solar are hardly carbon free considering that they require fossil fuel backup...
hunter
Mar 2022
#87
Pretending that only fuel-related emissions matter? I suppose one could claim that.
FBaggins
Mar 2022
#119
Which ones would still have happened with the design under discussion in the OP?
FBaggins
Mar 2022
#166
So, whenever the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining we live without electricity.
hunter
Mar 2022
#131
Multiple technologies are being developed right now. By engineers. Not magicians.
lagomorph777
Mar 2022
#135
yeah real safe - so safe you cant live in vast swaths of the earth now - Fukushima ring a bell?
Blues Heron
Mar 2022
#10
It's over 40 years since Mile Island, come on people lets not be luddites. Atomic power is beyond...
uponit7771
Mar 2022
#8
you are dreaming - its just as dangerous as ever. Fukushima was only ten years ago
Blues Heron
Mar 2022
#13
Fukushima was 60 years old and not supposed to be operating, your making the case for new
uponit7771
Mar 2022
#16
Irrelevant point, enforce the rules nuclear works. Just like airliners. Not perfect but better than
uponit7771
Mar 2022
#106
Not with 21st century tech, we all need to update ourselves on nuke power. Take down the old
uponit7771
Mar 2022
#118
Company always cut corners so I am absolutely against nukes...there is no coming back from a
Demsrule86
Mar 2022
#154
Fukushima: old reactor built right on a coastal area with a long history of earthquakes/tsunamis.
betsuni
Mar 2022
#27
Its inherently a bad idea, whatever new fangled XTRA SAFE!# tech they come up with
Blues Heron
Mar 2022
#50
How come nobody ever worries about insurance for the seven million people who die each year...
NNadir
Mar 2022
#22
It's the same uranium as it's always been, same uranium mines, same processing, same waste.
Blues Heron
Mar 2022
#38
How many reactor accidents has the Navy had since they started using them?
Cuthbert Allgood
Mar 2022
#137
none of the nukes are getting any younger - which will be the next to blow?
Blues Heron
Mar 2022
#103
Aggressive renewable energy schemes in places like California, Denmark, and Germany have failed...
hunter
Mar 2022
#42
Not really comfortable with nukes and "out of the box" in the same paragraph...
lagomorph777
Mar 2022
#116
Shit, are they going to bring back asbestos and lead paint while they're at it?
Initech
Mar 2022
#133
Just stop it. Economic de-growth is the only sane path to sustainable human life on earth.
Ron Green
Mar 2022
#144
Renewables do not have enough EROEI to be the sole energy sources atm. Nuclear is a must.
Celerity
Mar 2022
#167