TFG attorney, John Eastman, former employer just gutted Eastman claim of Atty/client privilege

[dsc]

9. I certainly don't think attorney client privilege exists here

but fail to see the relevance of Eastman's using his employer's email to this issue. The privilege belongs to the client, not Eastman, so Eastman's misconduct is irrelevant to this issue. Now, the fact that Eastman and Trump conspired to fix an election, that misconduct is very relevant to the issue of privilege.